切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肥胖与代谢病电子杂志 ›› 2025, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (04) : 270 -275. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-9605.2025.04.003

论著

单吻合口袖状胃空肠吻合术与单吻合口胃旁路术治疗肥胖症的临床疗效分析
康星1, 俞杭1,2, 单晓东1, 孙喜太1, 褚薛慧1,()   
  1. 1210008 南京,南京大学医学院附属鼓楼医院胰腺与代谢外科
    2210046 南京,南京大学医学院附属泰康仙林鼓楼医院普外科
  • 收稿日期:2025-03-15 出版日期:2025-11-30
  • 通信作者: 褚薛慧

Analysis of clinical efficacy of single-anastomosis sleeve jejunal bypass and one-anastomosis gastric bypass in the treatment of obesity

Xing Kang1, Hang Yu1, Xiaodong Shan1,2, Xitai Sun1, Xuehui Chu1,()   

  1. 1Department of Pancreatic and Metabolic Surgery, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, 210008, Nanjing
    2Department of Surgery, Taikang Xianlin Drum Tower Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, 210046, Nanjing, China
  • Received:2025-03-15 Published:2025-11-30
  • Corresponding author: Xuehui Chu
引用本文:

康星, 俞杭, 单晓东, 孙喜太, 褚薛慧. 单吻合口袖状胃空肠吻合术与单吻合口胃旁路术治疗肥胖症的临床疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华肥胖与代谢病电子杂志, 2025, 11(04): 270-275.

Xing Kang, Hang Yu, Xiaodong Shan, Xitai Sun, Xuehui Chu. Analysis of clinical efficacy of single-anastomosis sleeve jejunal bypass and one-anastomosis gastric bypass in the treatment of obesity[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Obesity and Metabolic Diseases(Electronic Edition), 2025, 11(04): 270-275.

目的

比较单吻合口袖状胃空肠吻合术(SASJ)和单吻合口胃旁路术(OAGB)治疗肥胖症的临床疗效。

方法

回顾性收集2023年1月至2024年1月于南京大学医学院附属鼓楼医院减重代谢外科行SASJ和OAGB的患者临床资料,共纳入152例患者,根据接受的手术方式分为SASJ组(82例)和OAGB组(70例)。主要指标包括患者术前、术后6个月至12个月的体重、BMI、糖脂代谢指标等,并记录合并症的缓解情况。通过卡方检验和独立样本t检验对数据进行统计分析。

结果

回顾性收集2023年1月至2024年1月于南京大学医学院附属鼓楼医院减重代谢外科行SASJ和OAGB的患者临床资料,共纳入152例患者,根据接受的手术方式分为SASJ组(82例)和OAGB组(70例)。主要指标包括患者术前、术后6个月至12个月的体重、BMI、糖脂代谢指标等,并记录合并症的缓解情况。通过卡方检验和独立样本t检验对数据进行统计分析。回顾性收集2023年1月至2024年1月于南京大学医学院附属鼓楼医院减重代谢外科行SASJ和OAGB的患者临床资料,共纳入152例患者,根据接受的手术方式分为SASJ组(82例)和OAGB组(70例)。主要指标包括患者术前、术后6个月至12个月的体重、BMI、糖脂代谢指标等,并记录合并症的缓解情况。通过卡方检验和独立样本t检验对数据进行统计分析。

结论

SASJ和OAGB在体重减轻和缓解并发症方面疗效相近,而SASJ术后营养不良的风险低于OAGB,且SASJ术后发生吻合口溃疡的概率更低。

Objective

To compare the clinical efficacy of Single-Anastomosis Sleeve Jejunal Bypass (SASJ) and One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB) for the treatment of obesity.

Methods

Retrospective clinical data were collected from patients who underwent SASJ and OAGB from January 2023 to January 2024 at the Department of Weight Loss and Metabolic Surgery, Drum Tower Hospital, School of Medicine, Nanjing University, China, and the main indexes included the patients' preoperative and postoperative weights, BMI, and glycemic-lipid metabolism indexes from 6 to 12 months after surgery, and the remission of comorbidities was also recorded. The data were statistically analyzed using chi-square test and independent sample t-test.

Results

Total 152 patients were included in this study and were categorized into SASJ group (n=82) and OAGB group (n=70) according to the type of surgery they underwent. Significant weight loss as well as remission of complications were recorded at 6 and 12 months after both procedures. The weights at 6 and 12 months postoperatively were (93.1±15.7) kg and (84.2±16.6) kg in the SASJ group and (94.1±26.2) kg and (85.3±22.7) kg in the OAGB group, respectively.The remission rates for T2DM were 91.7% in the SASJ group and 91.7% in the OAGB group. and OAGB showed remission rates of 91.7% and 90% for T2DM and 81.3% and 80% for GERD, respectively. In addition, a relatively high risk of postoperative malnutrition in OAGB was documented at 12 months postoperatively. This was manifested by low postoperative nutritional markers such as albumin, serum calcium, and 25 hydroxyvitamin D, which were still within the normal range. Postoperative gastroscopic findings revealed anastomotic ulcers in 6 patients after OAGB, whereas SASJ had fewer abnormal postoperative gastroscopic findings, with only 1 anastomotic ulcer as well as 2 cases of reflux esophagitis.

Conclusions

SASJ and OAGB have similar efficacy in weight loss and relief of complications, while the risk of malnutrition after SASJ is lower than that after OAGB, and the probability of anastomotic ulcer after SASJ is lower.

图1 手术方式示意图
表1 两组患者术前一般特征
表2 两组患者术后体重变化
表3 两组患者术后并发症缓解情况
表4 两组患者术后12个月营养指标
表5 两组患者术后12月胃镜结果
[1]
Perdomo CM, Cohen RV, Sumithran P, et al. Contemporary medical, device, and surgical therapies for obesity in adults [J]. Lancet (London, England), 2023, 401(10382): 1116-1130.
[2]
Chandrasekaran P, Weiskurchen R. the role of obesity in type 2 diabetes mellitus-an overview [J]. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2024, 25(3): 1882.
[3]
Carlsson LMS, Sjoholm K, Jacobson P, et al. Life expectancy after bariatric surgery in the swedish obese subjects study [J]. The New England Journal of Medicine, 2020, 383(16): 1535-1543.
[4]
Sewefy AM, Atyia AM, H Kayed T, et al. Single-anastomosis sleeve jejunal (SAS-J) bypass as revisional surgery after primary restrictive bariatric procedures [J]. Obesity Surgery, 2022, 32(8): 2807-2813.
[5]
Heinonen S, Saarinen T, Merilainen S, et al. Roux-en-Y versus one-anastomosis gastric bypass (RYSA study): weight loss, metabolic improvements, and nutrition at 1 year after surgery, a multicenter randomized controlled trial [J]. Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.), 2023, 31(12): 2909-2923.
[6]
Santoro S, Velhote MCP, Malzoni CE, et al. Preliminary results from digestive adaptation: a new surgical proposal for treating obesity, based on physiology and evolution [J]. Sao Paulo Medical Journal = Revista Paulista De Medicina, 2006, 124(4): 192-197.
[7]
Santoro S, Castro LC, Velhote MCP, et al. Sleeve gastrectomy with transit bipartition: a potent intervention for metabolic syndrome and obesity [J]. Annals of Surgery, 2012, 256(1): 104-110.
[8]
Sewefy AM, Atyia AM, Mohammed MM, et al. Single anastomosis sleeve jejunal (SAS-J) bypass as a treatment for morbid obesity, technique and review of 1986 cases and 6 Years follow-up. Retrospective cohort [J]. International Journal of Surgery (London, England), 2022, 102: 106662.
[9]
Shirazi N, Beglaibter N, Grinbaum R, et al. Nutritional outcomes one year after one anastomosis gastric bypass compared to sleeve gastrectomy [J/OL]. Nutrients, 2022, 14(13): 2597.
[10]
Hany M, Zidan A, Aboelsoud MR, et al. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy vs one-anastomosis gastric bypass 5-year follow-up: a single-blinded randomized controlled trial [J]. Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery: Official Journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, 2024, 28(5): 621-633.
[11]
Bandlamudi N, Holt G, Graham Y, et al. Malnutrition following one-anastomosis gastric bypass: a systematic review [J]. Obesity Surgery, 2023, 33(12): 4137-4146.
[12]
Itlaybah A, Elbanna H, Emile S, et al. Correlation between the number of ghrelin-secreting cells in the gastric fundus and excess weight loss after sleeve gastrectomy [J]. Obesity Surgery, 2019, 29(1): 76-83.
[13]
Castillo J, Fabrega E, Escalante CF, et al. Liver transplantation in a case of steatohepatitis and subacute hepatic failure after biliopancreatic diversion for morbid obesity [J]. Obesity Surgery, 2001, 11(5): 640-642.
[14]
Pazouki A, Kermansaravi M. Single anastomosis sleeve-jejunal bypass: a new method of bariatric/metabolic surgery [J]. Obesity Surgery, 2019, 29(11): 3769-3770.
[15]
Sayadishraki M, Rezaei MT, Mahmoudieh M, et al. Single-anastomosis sleeve jejunal bypass, a novel bariatric surgery, versus other familiar methods: results of a 6-month follow-up-a comparative study [J]. Obesity Surgery, 2020, 30(2): 769-776.
[16]
Delko T, Kraljevic M, Lazaridis I I, et al. Laparoscopic Roux-Y-gastric bypass versus laparoscopic one-anastomosis gastric bypass for obesity: clinical & metabolic results of a prospective randomized controlled trial [J]. Surgical Endoscopy, 2024, 38(7): 3875-3886.
[17]
Kermansaravi M, Daryabari S N, Karami R, et al. One anastomosis gastric bypass as a one-stage bariatric surgical procedure in patients with BMI ≥ 50 kg/m2 [J]. Scientific Reports, 2022, 12(1): 10507.
[18]
Lustig R H. The neuroendocrinology of obesity [J]. Endocrinology and Metabolism Clinics of North America, 2001, 30(3): 765-785.
[1] 康星, 俞杭, 单晓东, 孙喜太, 褚薛慧. 单孔腹腔镜袖状胃切除术围手术期血液管理措施的比较研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(01): 18-21.
[2] 陈斌雄, 谢铭. 袖状胃切除术与胃旁路术对肥胖合并T2DM的治疗效果[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(04): 461-466.
[3] 陆嘉杰, 严帅, 蔡卫华, 吴金柱. 肥胖症患者袖状胃切除术后体重反弹的相关因素分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(03): 349-352.
[4] 乔晞. 肥胖相关性肾脏疾病的治疗[J/OL]. 中华肾病研究电子杂志, 2025, 14(05): 300-300.
[5] 朱风尚, 熊光苏, 韩峻峰. 重视减重多模式组合和个体化治疗[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2025, 15(06): 561-564.
[6] 吴振帼, 于岩波, 李延青. 内镜减重与代谢疗法的治疗新进展[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2025, 15(03): 193-198.
[7] 尹巧英, 钱雅妮, 雷慧恩, 王石柳, 李婷婷, 尹瑞华, 卢璐. 针药结合治疗痰湿型多囊卵巢综合征肥胖:随机对照试验[J/OL]. 中华针灸电子杂志, 2025, 14(03): 99-103.
[8] 王武杰, 郎丽娟, 孙一然, 刘斌, 王永正, 周彤, 李玉亮. 胃左动脉栓塞术治疗肥胖症患者一例[J/OL]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2025, 13(02): 184-186.
[9] 王昊杰, 习璞, 申晓军. 《人工智能在代谢减重外科中的现状和未来前景的国际专家共识》解读:基于28项共识声明的证据分析[J/OL]. 中华肥胖与代谢病电子杂志, 2025, 11(04): 257-262.
[10] 陈文辉, 刘燕, 胡瑞翔, 胡嵩浩, 姜舒文, 董志勇, 王存川. 功能性袖状胃切除术:一种新概念的减重手术方式[J/OL]. 中华肥胖与代谢病电子杂志, 2025, 11(03): 163-169.
[11] 袁园, 周英淑仪, 蒋子琪, 周斌, 徐洪鎏, 李苇苇, 陈平, 高丽莲. 减重术后患者低血糖风险识别及症状管理的最佳证据总结[J/OL]. 中华肥胖与代谢病电子杂志, 2025, 11(03): 206-212.
[12] 谭华勇, 惠远见, 付应峰, 张宸炎, 肖高春, 杨景哥. 腹腔镜袖状胃切除术后胃狭窄的诊治与预防[J/OL]. 中华肥胖与代谢病电子杂志, 2025, 11(03): 232-239.
[13] 中国医师协会外科医师分会肥胖和代谢病外科专家工作组, 中国医师协会外科医师分会肥胖代谢病综合管理与护理专家工作组, 中国肥胖代谢外科研究协作组. 中国肥胖代谢外科数据库:2024年度报告[J/OL]. 中华肥胖与代谢病电子杂志, 2025, 11(02): 85-91.
[14] 谢礼锋, 贾静, 陈琦玮, 柳燕, 李新宇. 定锚法脐部整形缝合技术在经脐单孔腹腔镜减重手术中的应用[J/OL]. 中华肥胖与代谢病电子杂志, 2025, 11(02): 92-99.
[15] 刘敏, 林清然, 董志勇, 赵宛鄂, 吴丽娜, 杨华. 减重手术后患者饮食管理困境的质性研究[J/OL]. 中华肥胖与代谢病电子杂志, 2025, 11(02): 142-147.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?