切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肥胖与代谢病电子杂志 ›› 2025, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (04) : 257 -262. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-9605.2025.04.001

指南解读

《人工智能在代谢减重外科中的现状和未来前景的国际专家共识》解读:基于28项共识声明的证据分析
王昊杰, 习璞, 申晓军()   
  1. 200433 上海,海军军医大学第一附属医院普外科
  • 收稿日期:2025-11-01 出版日期:2025-11-30
  • 通信作者: 申晓军

International expert consensus on the current status and future prospects of artificial intelligence in metabolic and bariatric surgery interpretation: Evidence-Based Analysis of 28 Consensus Statements

Haojie Wang, Pu Xi, Xiaojun Shen()   

  1. Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China
  • Received:2025-11-01 Published:2025-11-30
  • Corresponding author: Xiaojun Shen
引用本文:

王昊杰, 习璞, 申晓军. 《人工智能在代谢减重外科中的现状和未来前景的国际专家共识》解读:基于28项共识声明的证据分析[J/OL]. 中华肥胖与代谢病电子杂志, 2025, 11(04): 257-262.

Haojie Wang, Pu Xi, Xiaojun Shen. International expert consensus on the current status and future prospects of artificial intelligence in metabolic and bariatric surgery interpretation: Evidence-Based Analysis of 28 Consensus Statements[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Obesity and Metabolic Diseases(Electronic Edition), 2025, 11(04): 257-262.

人工智能(AI)在代谢减重外科(MBS)领域的应用潜力巨大但面临实践挑战,亟需规范化指导。在此背景下,2025年发布的《人工智能在代谢减重外科中的现状和未来前景的国际专家共识》围绕AI在MBS中的核心价值与发展前景达成了重要共识。本文旨在对该共识进行深度解读:基于2017-2025年间相关文献证据,对共识所涵盖的关键议题(包括AI在手术培训与规范化、优化转诊流程、开发预后预测模型及完善并发症风险分层等方面的研究进展与应用现状)进行实证分析;同时,深入探讨共识指出的AI应用所面临的挑战(如过度依赖风险、伦理问题与技术局限)。通过对共识声明的循证解读,本文旨在帮助医务人员更准确地把握AI在MBS领域的应用现状、核心价值、潜在风险及未来方向,促进该共识的临床理解与实践转化,推动代谢减重外科向精准化、个性化发展,最终使患者获益。

The application of artificial intelligence (AI) in the field of metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) holds significant potential but faces practical challenges, necessitating standardized guidance. Against this backdrop, the international expert consensus titled "The Current Status and Future Prospects of Artificial Intelligence in Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery," released in 2025, has reached important agreements regarding the core value and development prospects of AI in MBS. This article aims to provide an in-depth interpretation of this consensus: Based on relevant literature evidence from 2017 to 2025, it conducts an empirical analysis of the key issues covered in the consensus, including research progress and application status of AI in surgical training and standardization, optimization of referral processes, development of prognostic prediction models, and improvement of complication risk stratification. Additionally, it delves into the challenges of AI application highlighted by the consensus, such as the risk of over-reliance, ethical concerns, and technical limitations. Through an evidence-based interpretation of the consensus statement, this article seeks to assist healthcare professionals in more accurately understanding the current application status, core value, potential risks, and future directions of AI in the field of MBS. It aims to promote the clinical comprehension and practical implementation of the consensus, advance metabolic and bariatric surgery toward precision and personalization, and ultimately benefit patients.

[1]
Kermansaravi M, Chiappetta S, Shahabi Shahmiri S, et al. International expert consensus on the current status and future prospects of artificial intelligence in metabolic and bariatric surgery [J]. Scientific Reports, 2025, 15(1): 9312.
[2]
Duran Espinoza V, Belmar Riveros F, Jarry Trujillo C, et al. Five-year experience training surgeons with a laparoscopic simulation training program for bariatric surgery: A quasi-experimental design [J]. Obesity Surgery, 2023, 33(6): 1831-1837.
[3]
Park JJ, Tiefenbach J, Demetriades AK. The role of artificial intelligence in surgical simulation [J]. Frontiers in Medical Technology, 2022, 4: 1076755.
[4]
Fer D, Zhang B, Abukhalil R, et al. An artificial intelligence model that automatically labels roux-en-Y gastric bypasses, a comparison to trained surgeon annotators [J]. Surgical Endoscopy, 2023, 37(7): 5665-5672.
[5]
Dayan D. Implementation of artificial intelligence–based computer vision model for sleeve gastrectomy: Experience in one tertiary center [J]. Obesity Surgery, 2024, 34(2): 330-336.
[6]
Lopez EKH, Helm MC, Gould JC, et al. Primary care providers’ attitudes and knowledge of bariatric surgery [J]. Surgical Endoscopy, 2020, 34(5): 2273-2278.
[7]
Samaan JS, Yeo YH, Rajeev N, et al. Assessing the accuracy of responses by the language model ChatGPT to questions regarding bariatric surgery [J]. Obesity surgery, 2023, 33(6): 1790-1796.
[8]
Lee Y, Shin T, Tessier L, et al. Harnessing artificial intelligence in bariatric surgery: Comparative analysis of ChatGPT-4, bing, and bard in generating clinician-level bariatric surgery recommendations [J]. Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases, 2024, 20(7): 603-608.
[9]
Lee Y, Tessier L, Brar K, et al. Performance of artificial intelligence in bariatric surgery: Comparative analysis of ChatGPT-4, bing, and bard in the American society for metabolic and bariatric surgery textbook of bariatric surgery questions [J]. Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases, 2024, 20(7): 609-613.
[10]
Leng Y, Yang Y, Liu J, et al. Evaluating the feasibility of ChatGPT-4 as a knowledge resource in bariatric surgery: A preliminary assessment [J]. Obesity Surgery, 2025, 35(2): 645-650.
[11]
Mousavi M, Tabesh M R, Moghadami S M, et al. Determining the importance of lifestyle risk factors in predicting binge eating disorder after bariatric surgery using machine learning models and lifestyle scores [J]. Obesity Surgery, 2025, 35(4):1396-1406 .
[12]
Saux P, Bauvin P, Raverdy V, et al. Development and validation of an interpretable machine learning-based calculator for predicting 5-year weight trajectories after bariatric surgery: A multinational retrospective cohort SOPHIA study [J]. The Lancet. Digital Health, 2023, 5(10): e692-e702.
[13]
Vannucci M, Niyishaka P, Collins T, et al. Machine learning models to predict success of endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty using total and excess weight loss percent achievement: A multicentre study [J]. Surgical Endoscopy, 2024, 38(1): 229-239.
[14]
Cao Y, Näslund I, Näslund E, et al. Using a convolutional neural network to predict remission of diabetes after gastric bypass surgery: Machine learning study from the scandinavian obesity surgery register [J]. JMIR medical informatics, 2021, 9(8): e25612.
[15]
Hsu JL, Chen KA, Butler LR, et al. Application of machine learning to predict postoperative gastrointestinal bleed in bariatric surgery [J]. Surgical endoscopy, 2023, 37(9): 7121-7127.
[16]
Nudel J, Bishara AM, de Geus SWL, et al. Development and validation of machine learning models to predict gastrointestinal leak and venous thromboembolism after weight loss surgery: An analysis of the MBSAQIP database [J]. Surgical endoscopy, 2021, 35(1): 182-191.
[17]
Butler LR, Chen KA, Hsu J, et al. Predicting readmission after bariatric surgery using machine learning [J]. Surg Obes Relat Dis, 2023, 19(11): 1236-1244.
[18]
Ali H, Patel P, Malik TF, et al. Endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty reintervention score using supervised machine learning [J]. Gastrointestinal endoscopy, 2023, 98(5): 747-754.e5.
[19]
Giudicelli G, Poletti PA, Platon A, et al. Development and validation of a predictive model for internal hernia after roux-en-Y gastric bypass in a multicentric retrospective cohort: The swirl, weight excess loss, liquid score [J]. Annals of Surgery, 2022, 275(6): 1137-1142.
[20]
Prendin F, Streicher O, Cappon G, et al. Towards a decision support system for post bariatric hypoglycaemia: Development of forecasting algorithms in unrestricted daily-life conditions [J]. BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2025, 25(1): 33.
[21]
Abdelwanis M, Alarafati HK, Tammam MMS, et al. Exploring the risks of automation bias in healthcare artificial intelligence applications: A bowtie analysis [J]. Journal of Safety Science and Resilience, 2024, 5(4): 460-469.
[22]
Bond RR, Novotny T, Andrsova I, et al. Automation bias in medicine: The influence of automated diagnoses on interpreter accuracy and uncertainty when reading electrocardiograms [J]. Journal of Electrocardiology, 2018, 51(6): S6-S11.
[23]
Lyell D, Magrabi F, Raban MZ, et al. Automation bias in electronic prescribing [J]. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 2017, 17(1): 28.
[24]
Pruski M. AI-enhanced healthcare: Not a new paradigm for informed consent [J]. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry, 2024, 21(3): 475-489.
[25]
Lopez-Gonzalez R, Sanchez-Cordero S, Pujol-Gebellí J, et al. Evaluation of the impact of ChatGPT on the selection of surgical technique in bariatric surgery [J]. Obesity surgery, 2025, 35(1): 19-24.
[26]
Yuan B, Li J. The policy effect of the general data protection regulation (GDPR) on the digital public health sector in the european union: An empirical investigation [J]. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2019, 16(6): 1070.
[27]
Khan Y, Sánchez D, Domingo-Ferrer J. Federated learning-based natural language processing: A systematic literature review [J]. Artificial Intelligence Review, 2024, 57(12): 320.
[28]
Lavanchy JL, Ramesh S, Dall’Alba D, et al. Challenges in multi-centric generalization: Phase and step recognition in roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery [J]. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg, 2024, 19(11): 2249-2257.
[29]
王存川, 周福庆, 董志勇. 国际减重与代谢外科最新动态和评价 [J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2023, 43(5): 503-509.
[30]
AbdulQawy A, Sallam E, Elkholy A. UnBias: Unveiling bias implications in deep learning models for healthcare applications [J]. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform, 2025, 29(2): 1464-1471.
[31]
Obermeyer Z, Powers B, Vogeli C, et al. Dissecting racial bias in an algorithm used to manage the health of populations [J]. Science, 2019, 366(6464): 447-453.
[32]
Hasanzadeh F, Josephson CB, Waters G, et al. Bias recognition and mitigation strategies in artificial intelligence healthcare applications [J]. NPJ Digital Medicine, 2025, 8: 154.
[33]
Mahjoubi M, Shahabi S, Sheikhbahaei S, et al. Evaluating AI Capabilities in Bariatric Surgery: A Study on ChatGPT-4 and DALL·E 3’s Recognition and Illustration Accuracy [J]. Obesity Surgery, 2025, 35(2): 638-641.
[34]
Li Z, Wang L, Tian C, et al. Identification of hub biomarkers in liver post-metabolic and bariatric surgery using comprehensive machine learning (experimental studies) [J]. International Journal of Surgery, 2025, 111(2): 1814-1824.
[35]
Rashid M, Al Qarni A, Al Mahri S, et al. Transcriptome changes and metabolic outcomes after bariatric surgery in adults with obesity and type 2 diabetes [J]. Journal of the Endocrine Society, 2023, 8(1): bvad159.
[36]
Nahavandi D, Alizadehsani R, Khosravi A, et al. Application of artificial intelligence in wearable devices: Opportunities and challenges [J]. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, 2022, 213: 106541.
[37]
Iftikhar M, Saqib M, Zareen M, et al. Artificial intelligence: Revolutionizing robotic surgery: review [J]. Ann Med Surg (Lond), 2024, 86(9): 5401-5409.
[1] 张振奇, 卢漫, 齐艺涵, 庄敏, 胡紫玥, 王璐. 基于DeepSeek大语言模型的胃癌和直肠癌超声报告结构化及T分期自动评估研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2025, 22(11): 1055-1061.
[2] 周欣, 梁豪进, 邓振宇, 肖菊花, 周小军. 基于人工智能技术评价江西省孕11~13+6周产前超声筛查质量现状及提出能力提升对策[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2025, 22(09): 850-857.
[3] 张振奇, 齐艺涵, 王璐, 胡紫玥, 李婷婷, 卢漫. 大语言模型DeepSeek-R1在甲状腺超声报告质量控制中的初步应用[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2025, 22(09): 832-837.
[4] 江瑶, 蒋程, 余翔, 谭莹, 温昕, 温慧莹, 彭桂艳, 李胜利. 基于注意力机制改进的子宫解剖结构检测与分割多任务模型的性能评估[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2025, 22(08): 703-710.
[5] 中华医学会超声医学分会, 中国研究型医院肿瘤介入治疗委员会, 中国妇幼保健协会乳腺保健专业委员会, 中华医学会肿瘤学分会乳腺癌专业委员会, 中国抗癌协会乳腺癌专业委员会, 中国人体健康科技促进会乳腺专业委员会. 无手术适应证乳腺癌消融治疗专家共识(2025版)[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(01): 1-8.
[6] 王祝愉, 权晶晶. 人工智能辅助参与牙体牙髓基础与临床研究[J/OL]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(01): 25-33.
[7] 吕思怡, 王琰琪, 仇珺, 陈宇江, 高洁. 人工智能图像处理技术在口腔医学中的应用[J/OL]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(01): 40-46.
[8] 李翠君, 蔡耿彬, 梁晓铟, 王泳怡, 詹欣怡, 古佩明. 人工智能在口腔护理中的应用[J/OL]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(01): 47-50.
[9] 陈泽涛, 邱龙诗语, 龚卓弘, 刘恒毅, 曾培生, 施梦汝. 口腔种植定量测量人工智能化的难点解析与解决策略[J/OL]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(01): 1-8.
[10] 杨婷麟, 黄韬. 人工智能应用于甲状腺结节评估的进展与挑战[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2026, 20(01): 60-65.
[11] 梅昊楠, 杨瑞, 刘修恒. 人工智能辅助病理学图像分析在前列腺癌诊断中的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(01): 1-7.
[12] 丁小博, 陈洁, 王艳波. 人工智能在泌尿系结石诊治中的应用进展[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(01): 15-21.
[13] 樊帆, 黄浩, 付莉丽, 周春梅, 马雪霞, 黄海. 下尿路功能障碍患者智能化尿控标准病房的建设及成效[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(01): 44-50.
[14] 唐玥, 陈家璐, 覃德龙, 李宗龙, 汤朝晖, 全志伟. 基于AI的多模态影像在肝癌诊治中应用及面临挑战[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2026, 15(01): 4-9.
[15] 脊髓电刺激治疗卒中后偏瘫中国专家共识编写组, 中华医学会神经外科学分会功能神经外科学组, 中国研究型医院学会神经外科学专业委员会, 世界华人神经外科协会功能神经外科专业委员会, 北京医学会神经外科学分会功能神经外科专业组, 北京医学会神经外科学分会周围神经外科专业组. 脊髓电刺激治疗卒中后偏瘫中国专家共识(2025年)[J/OL]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2026, 16(01): 8-18.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?