切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肥胖与代谢病电子杂志 ›› 2025, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (04) : 263 -269. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-9605.2025.04.002

论著

单孔与多孔腹腔镜袖状胃切除术的短期效果比较:减重、心理状态及切口美观度分析
韩晓东(), 彭刚, 王晨, 班旭彦, 许听, 刘伟杰, 张弘玮   
  1. 200233 上海,上海交通大学医学院附属第六人民医院普外科
  • 收稿日期:2025-05-07 出版日期:2025-11-30
  • 通信作者: 韩晓东
  • 基金资助:
    四大慢病重大专项"(2025ZD0550504); 国家自然科学基金项目(82370901); 上海市"科技创新行动计划"科普专项项目(24DZ2304800)

Comparison of short-term outcomes between single-port and multi-port laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: analysis of weight loss, psychological status, and incision aesthetics

Xiaodong Han(), Gang Peng, Chen Wang, Xuyan Ban, Ting Xu, Weijie Liu, Hongwei Zhang   

  1. Department of General Surgery, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai 200233, China
  • Received:2025-05-07 Published:2025-11-30
  • Corresponding author: Xiaodong Han
引用本文:

韩晓东, 彭刚, 王晨, 班旭彦, 许听, 刘伟杰, 张弘玮. 单孔与多孔腹腔镜袖状胃切除术的短期效果比较:减重、心理状态及切口美观度分析[J/OL]. 中华肥胖与代谢病电子杂志, 2025, 11(04): 263-269.

Xiaodong Han, Gang Peng, Chen Wang, Xuyan Ban, Ting Xu, Weijie Liu, Hongwei Zhang. Comparison of short-term outcomes between single-port and multi-port laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: analysis of weight loss, psychological status, and incision aesthetics[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Obesity and Metabolic Diseases(Electronic Edition), 2025, 11(04): 263-269.

目的

本研究旨在比较单孔腹腔镜袖状胃切除术(LSG)与多孔LSG在术后短期减重效果、心理状态改善及患者切口满意度等方面的差异,探讨单孔LSG的临床优势及其潜在机制,为肥胖症患者的个体化手术方式选择提供科学依据。

方法

回顾性分析2023年9月至2024年12月在上海市第六人民医院接受LSG的女性患者,共341例(单孔组100例,多孔组241例)。纳入标准包括年龄≥18岁、符合IFSO手术指征及完成基线数据采集;排除标准为严重精神疾病、腹部手术史或术后严重并发症。手术流程依据指南进行,单孔组采用单孔入路操作平台,多孔组参照标准腹腔镜手术流程。观察指标包括术前及术后3个月的体重、BMI、BAI、BDI、PSQI及SCAR评分,计算ΔBMI、%TWL、%EWL及心理评分变化。统计学分析采用R 4.4.3软件,计量资料以(±s)表示,组间比较采用独立样本t检验,计数资料采用Fisher确切概率法,倾向评分匹配采用1:1最近邻匹配法,P<0.05为差异有统计学意义。

结果

基线资料比较显示,单孔手术组患者的年龄、体重、BMI、BAI评分、BDI评分及PSQI评分均显著低于多孔手术组(P<0.05),而腰围、臀围及腰臀比无显著差异(P>0.05)。术后3个月随访结果显示,单孔手术组在体重、BMI、BAI评分、ΔBAI、BDI评分、PSQI评分、ΔPSQI及SCAR评分方面均显著优于多孔手术组(P<0.05),但两组在ΔBMI、%TWL、%EWL及ΔBDI方面无显著差异(P>0.05)。倾向评分匹配后,两组基线资料无显著差异(P>0.05),术后三月单孔手术组在BAI评分、BDI评分、PSQI评分、SCAR评分及心理评分变化(ΔBAI、ΔBDI、ΔPSQI)方面仍显著优于多孔手术组(P<0.05)。中介效应分析显示,手术方式对术后三月心理状况变化的直接效应及总效应均显著,但通过SCAR评分的间接效应不显著。两组术后并发症发生率无显著差异(P>0.05),主要包括切口脂肪液化、切口血肿、肺部感染及术后出血,均经治疗后恢复。

结论

单孔LSG在术后心理状态改善及切口美观度方面优于多孔LSG,但减重效果及安全性相当,未来需进一步验证其长期优势及机制。

Objective

This study aimed to compare the differences between single-port laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) and multi-port LSG in terms of short-term postoperative weight loss, psychological status improvement, and patient satisfaction with incisions. It further explored the clinical advantages and potential mechanisms of single-port LSG to provide a scientific basis for individualized surgical options for obese patients.

Methods

This retrospective analysis included 341 female patients who underwent sleeve gastrectomy at Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital from September 2023 to December 2024 (100 in the single-port group and 241 in the multi-port group). Inclusion criteria were age≥18 years, meeting IFSO surgical indications, and completion of baseline data collection. Exclusion criteria included severe mental illness, history of abdominal surgery, or severe postoperative complications. Surgical procedures followed guidelines, with the single-port group using a single-port access platform and the multi-port group following standard laparoscopic procedures. Observation indicators included preoperative and 3-month postoperative weight, BMI, BAI, BDI, PSQI, and SCAR scores, with calculations of ΔBMI, %TWL, %EWL, and changes in psychological scores. Statistical analysis was performed using R 4.4.3 software. Continuous data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation, and intergroup comparisons were conducted using independent samples t-tests. Categorical data were analyzed using Fisher's exact test, and propensity score matching was performed using a 1:1 nearest-neighbor matching method. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Baseline data comparison showed that the single-port group had significantly lower age, weight, BMI, BAI score, BDI score, and PSQI score than the multi-port group (P<0.05), while waist circumference, hip circumference, and waist-to-hip ratio showed no significant difference (P>0.05). Three-month postoperative follow-up results revealed that the single-port group performed significantly better in weight, BMI, BAI score, ΔBAI, BDI score, PSQI score, ΔPSQI, and SCAR score (P<0.05), but no significant differences were observed between the two groups in ΔBMI, %TWL, %EWL, or ΔBDI (P>0.05). After propensity score matching, baseline characteristics showed no significant differences (P>0.05). At three months postoperatively, the single-port group still demonstrated superior BAI score, BDI score, PSQI score, SCAR score, and changes in psychological scores (ΔBAI, ΔBDI, ΔPSQI) compared to the multi-port group (P<0.05). Mediation analysis indicated that the surgical approach had significant direct and total effects on postoperative psychological changes, but the indirect effect through SCAR score was not significant. No significant difference was observed in postoperative complication rates (P>0.05), which mainly included incision fat liquefaction, incision hematoma, pulmonary infection, and postoperative bleeding, all of which resolved after treatment.

Conclusions

Single-port LSG outperforms multi-port LSG in postoperative psychological improvement and incision aesthetics, but weight loss efficacy and safety are comparable. Further validation of its long-term advantages and mechanisms is warranted.

表1 单孔手术组和多孔手术组基线资料的比较
表2 单孔手术组和多孔手术组术后三月的比较
表3 倾向评分匹配后单孔手术组和多孔手术组基线资料的比较
表4 倾向评分匹配后单孔手术组和多孔手术组术后三月的比较
表7 术后并发症类型及发生数量
表5 不同手术方式通过SCAR评分影响术后三月心理状况的中介效应分析
表6 倾向评分匹配后不同手术方式通过SCAR评分影响术后三月心理状况的中介效应分析
[1]
闫瑞承, 罗建飞. 经脐单孔腹腔镜袖状胃切除技术难点与对策 [J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(9): 824-825.
[2]
杨珵璨, 于洋, 王文越, 等. 单孔腹腔镜胃袖状切除术疗效的初步研究 [J]. 腹部外科, 2022, 35(5): 344-349.
[3]
Borgeraas H, Hofsø D, Hertel JK, et al. Comparison of the effect of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy on remission of type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials [J]. Obes Rev, 2020, 21(6): e13011.
[4]
Paczkowska A, Hoffmann K, Raakow J, et al. Impact of bariatric surgery on depression, anxiety and stress symptoms among patients with morbid obesity: international multicentre study in Poland and Germany [J]. BJPsych Open, 2022, 8(1): e32.
[5]
Pyykkö JE, Aydin Ö, Gerdes VEA, et al. Psychological functioning and well-being before and after bariatric surgery; what is the benefit of being self-compassionate? [J]. Br J Health Psychol, 2022, 27(1): 96-115.
[6]
Eisenberg D, Shikora SA, Aar tSE, et al. 2022 American Society of Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery (ASMBS) and International Federation for the Surgery of Obesity and Metabolic Disorders (IFSO) Indications for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery [J]. Obes Surg, 2023, 33(1): 3-14.
[7]
王存川, 张鹏, 赵玉沛. 腹腔镜袖状胃切除术操作指南(2018版) [J/OL]. 中华肥胖与代谢病电子杂志, 2018, 4(04): 196-201.
[8]
中华医学会外科学分会甲状腺及代谢外科学组, 中国医师协会外科医师分会肥胖和糖尿病外科医师委员会. 中国肥胖及2型糖尿病外科治疗指南(2019版) [J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2019, 39(4): 301-306.
[9]
Roh MR. The SCAR (Scar Cosmesis Assessment and Rating) scale: new evaluation method for postoperative scars [J]. Br J Dermatol, 2016, 175(6): 1151-1152.
[10]
Benedetto U, Head SJ, Angelini GD, et al. Statistical primer: propensity score matching and its alternatives [J]. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 2018, 53(6): 1112-1117.
[11]
杨建军, 董文培, Wadjaja J, 等. 单孔腹腔镜胃袖状切除术265例临床分析 [J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2024, 44(08): 906-10.
[12]
杨景哥, 杨华, 高志光, 等. 经脐单孔腹腔镜袖状胃切除术治疗单纯性肥胖症一例 [J/OL]. 中华肥胖与代谢病电子杂志, 2016, 2(3): 178-80.
[13]
周福庆, 唐欣, 刘阳, 等. 单孔和小三孔腹腔镜袖状胃切除术治疗肥胖症的临床疗效 [J]. 中华消化外科杂志, 2024, 23(08): 1057-64.
[14]
Moreno Sanz C, Noguera Aguilar JF, Herrero Bogajo ML, et al. [Single incision laparoscopic surgery] [J]. Cir Esp, 2010, 88(1): 12-17.
[15]
Park Y, Park YS, Lee S, et al. Safety and effectiveness of reduced-port laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy in Asian morbidly obese patients [J]. Sci Rep, 2021, 11(1): 23511.
[16]
刘家盛, 李士军, 闫瑞承, 等. 单孔腹腔镜袖状胃切除术与传统腹腔镜袖状胃切除术的对比研究 [J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(9): 4.
[17]
Kassir R, Debs T, Blanc P, et al. Complications of bariatric surgery: Presentation and emergency management [J]. Int J Surg, 2016, 27: 77-81.
[18]
Mussa B, Defrancisco B, Campi L, et al. Single-Port Laparoscopy Compared with Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis [J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 2025, 14(14): 4915.
[1] 黄东航. 针式拉钩经皮穿刺悬吊与二氧化碳低压充气混合建腔单孔+1经锁骨下入路腔镜甲状腺手术[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2025, 19(06): 375-375.
[2] 康星, 俞杭, 单晓东, 孙喜太, 褚薛慧. 单孔腹腔镜袖状胃切除术围手术期血液管理措施的比较研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(01): 18-21.
[3] 严征远, 张恒, 曹能琦, 方兴超, 陈大敏. 单孔+1腹腔镜结直肠癌根治切除术的有效性及安全性临床观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(06): 615-618.
[4] 马超, 王传嘉, 张武坊. 经腋窝入路单孔腔镜保乳术与传统开放手术治疗早期乳腺癌的对比研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(06): 674-677.
[5] 欧阳骏骏, 蔡宝, 徐冰. 经脐单孔及常规腹腔镜阑尾切除术对阑尾炎患儿的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(05): 566-569.
[6] 李昊, 邰胜, 杨诚, 王宏志, 岳家斌, 孟佳林, 梁朝朝. 国产单孔机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术的初步应用[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(05): 565-571.
[7] 陈双, 李英儒. 单孔腹腔镜腹股沟疝经腹腹膜前修补术的技术与方法[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(06): 629-632.
[8] 张一忠, 吴卫东, 王廷峰, 司仙科, 汤睿, 柳楠. 单孔完全腹膜外修补技术治疗腰疝的多中心应用[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(06): 652-657.
[9] 钟泽坤, 陈明, 林满洲, 陈焕德. 经弓状线下缘入路单孔腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的临床疗效[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(06): 679-683.
[10] 熊海波, 张千秋, 李叔强, 曾云龙, 邓力宾, 袁家天, 吕波, 李俊. 经脐单孔和双孔腹腔镜下治疗小儿腹股沟疝疗效的Meta分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(06): 694-700.
[11] 钟晓盈, 曹杨, 于昕, 史宏辉, 樊庆泊, 刘海元. 单孔与多孔腹腔镜在巨大子宫肌瘤剔除术中的疗效与安全性对比[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 18(06): 348-353.
[12] 蒋嫒, 缪妙, 陈继明. 经腹壁瘢痕入路妇科单孔腹腔镜手术的理念创建与临床应用[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 18(05): 271-275.
[13] 瞿冀琛, 蒋雷. 非插管单孔胸腔镜经剑突纵隔肿瘤切除的临床应用分析[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 18(05): 301-304.
[14] 许伊纳, 刘继东, 张元鹏. 单孔腹腔镜经胃腔胰腺假性囊肿内引流术[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 18(05): 308-310.
[15] 鄢潇, 胡启明, 黄骁昊. 剖宫产术后腹壁疤痕肌层侵袭性纤维瘤[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 18(05): 305-307.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?