切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肥胖与代谢病电子杂志 ›› 2018, Vol. 04 ›› Issue (04) : 212 -217. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-9605.2018.04.005

所属专题: 文献

论著

DIO小鼠袖状胃切除术与改良Roux-en-Y胃旁路术模型建立
江多斯•帕依孜吾拉1, 赵培吉1, 李涛1, 姚刚1, 吐尔洪江•吐逊1,()   
  1. 1. 830054 乌鲁木齐,新疆医科大学第一附属医院
  • 收稿日期:2018-09-13 出版日期:2018-11-30
  • 通信作者: 吐尔洪江?吐逊
  • 基金资助:
    新疆医科大学研究生创新创业基金项目(CXCY2017042)

Establishment of sleeve gastrectomy and modified Roux-en-Y gastric bypass model in diet-induced obese mice

Payiziwula Jiangduosi1, Peiji Zhao1, Tao Li1, Gang Yao1, Tuxun Tuerhongjiang1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Liver Transplantation & Laparoscopic Surgery, Digestive & Vascular Surgery Center, the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi 830054, China
  • Received:2018-09-13 Published:2018-11-30
  • Corresponding author: Tuxun Tuerhongjiang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Tuerhongjiang Tuxun, Email:
引用本文:

江多斯•帕依孜吾拉, 赵培吉, 李涛, 姚刚, 吐尔洪江•吐逊. DIO小鼠袖状胃切除术与改良Roux-en-Y胃旁路术模型建立[J]. 中华肥胖与代谢病电子杂志, 2018, 04(04): 212-217.

Payiziwula Jiangduosi, Peiji Zhao, Tao Li, Gang Yao, Tuxun Tuerhongjiang. Establishment of sleeve gastrectomy and modified Roux-en-Y gastric bypass model in diet-induced obese mice[J]. Chinese Journal of Obesity and Metabolic Diseases(Electronic Edition), 2018, 04(04): 212-217.

目的

建立饮食诱导的肥胖型(DIO)小鼠袖状胃切除术(SG)与改良Roux-en-Y胃旁路术(RYGB)模型,为代谢外科治疗肥胖伴2型糖尿病(T2DM)机制研究提供动物模型。

方法

选取体质量(BMI)、周龄等均无明显差异的13周育龄雄性DIO小鼠,小鼠平均体质量(33.69±2.25)g,平均空腹血糖(11.66±1.52)mmol/L。显微镜下成功建立小鼠SG组(n=7)、改良RYGB组(n=10)和对照组(n=6)模型。术前及术后第l、2、4、7、14天进行小鼠体重和空腹血糖测量。

结果

SG组小鼠存活率为85.71%(6/7),改良RYGB组存活率为60.00%(6/10)。术后SG组和改良RYGB组小鼠体重进行性下降,而对照组小鼠体重变化不明显。术后第4、7、14天,SG组和改良RYGB组体重水平较对照组显著下降(P<0.05)。两种手术组小鼠术后不同观察时间段空腹血糖水平较对照组有明显的差异性(P<0.05)。

结论

本研究成功建立DIO小鼠显微镜下袖状胃切除术与改良Roux-en-Y胃旁路术模型。通过DIO小鼠建立改良Roux-en-Y胃旁路术和袖状胃切除术小鼠模型是有效和可行的。此模型为代谢外科治疗肥胖伴T2DM机制的研究提供一个更为合理的动物模型。

Objective

To establish sleeve gastrectomy (SG) and modified Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) model in diet-induced obese (DIO) mice and applying to basic mechanical research on mechanisms of metabolic surgery.

Methods

Weight and age matched 5-week-old male C57 BL/6 mice were selected and fed with 60% high fat diet for 8 weeks for induction of type 2 diabetes mellitus. The average weight and fasting plasma glucose levels were (33.79±2.0) g and (11.5±0.8) mmol/L respectively. Mice were randomized into modified SG group (n=7), RYGB group (n=10) and control group (n=6). The first two operations were performed under microscope. Traditional operation techniques were applied for the SG group while the modified RYGB group was treated with lower esophageal ligation and esophago-intestinal anastomosis. Body weight and fasting blood glucose levels were measured pre- and post-operative day (POD) 1, 2, 4, 7 and 14.

Results

The general survival rate of SG group was 85.71% (6/7) and 60% (6/10) in modified RYGB group. SG group and modified RYGB group showed significantly more weight loss and blood glucose reduction than that in control group. SG and modified RYGB groups presented significantly lower body masses at POD 4, 7 and 14 (P<0.05). The fasting blood glucose in the SG group and modified RYGB group was significantly lower than that in the control group (P<0.05).

Conclusions

SG and modified RYGB bypass models were successfully established in DIO mice. Modified RYGB bypass and SG in DIO mice were effective and feasible. They could also provide a more reasonable model for the basic research and better understanding of mechanism of metabolic surgery in those suffered from obesity with type 2 diabetes mellitus patients.

图4 显微镜下袖状胃切除术组
图5 显微镜下改良Roux-en-Y胃旁路术组
图1 各组小鼠术后存活率
图2 各组小鼠术后体重变化
图3 各组小鼠术后空腹血糖水平的变化
[1]
Singh GM, Danaei G, Farzadfar F, et al. The age-specific quantitative effects of metabolic risk factors on cardiovascular diseases and diabetes: a pooled analysis[J]. PLoS One, 2013, 8(7): e65174.
[2]
Collaboration NCDRF. Trends in adult body-mass index in 200 countries from 1975 to 2014: a pooled analysis of 1698 population-based measurement studies with 19.2 million participants[J]. Lancet, 2016, 387(10026): 1377-1396.
[3]
Rubino F, Moo TA, Rosen DJ, et al. Diabetes surgery: a new approach to an old disease[J]. Diabetes Care, 2009, 32 (Suppl 2): S368-S372.
[4]
Yang L, Shao J, Bian Y, et al. Prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus among inland residents in China (2000-2014): A meta-analysis[J].J Diabetes Investig, 2016, 7(6): 845-852.
[5]
梁辉,吴鸿浩.从减重手术的历史看减重术式的选择[J].中华胃肠外科杂志, 2012, 15(11): 1109-1111.
[6]
谢晓峰,王琛,李娜,等.胃袖状切除术与Roux-en-Y胃旁路术治疗2型糖尿病疗效的Meta分析[J].中华消化外科杂志, 2013, 12(12): 921-926.
[7]
Raj PP, Kumaravel R, Chandramaliteeswaran C, et al. Laparoscopic duodenojejunal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy: preliminary results of a prospective series from India[J].Surg Endosc, 2012, 26(3): 688-692.
[8]
刘殿刚,张若蹊,张超,等.代谢手术治疗肥胖合并代谢综合征的Meta分析——袖状胃切除术与胃旁路术疗效比较[J].国际外科学杂志, 2017, 44(2): 104-109.
[9]
Lopez PP, Nicholson SE, Burkhardt GE, et al. Development of a sleeve gastrectomy weight loss model in obese Zucker rats[J]. J Surg Res, 2009, 157(2): 243-250.
[10]
Patrikakos P, Toutouzas KG, Perrea D, et al. A surgical rat model of sleeve gastrectomy with staple technique: long-term weight loss results[J]. Obes Surg, 2009, 19(11): 1586-1590.
[11]
Mouse Models of Bariatric Surgery[M]// Current Protocols in Mouse Biology.John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2012.
[12]
杜德晓,张能维.影响代谢手术降糖疗效的因素分析[J].中华肥胖与代谢病电子杂志, 2016, 2(4): 191-195.
[13]
中国医师协会外科医师分会肥胖和糖尿病外科医师委员会.中国肥胖和2型糖尿病外科治疗指南(2014)[J].糖尿病临床, 2014, 8(11): 499-504.
[14]
Nannipieri M, Baldi S, Mari A, et al. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy: mechanisms of diabetes remission and role of gut hormones[J]. J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 2013, 98(11): 4391-4399.
[15]
Bruinsma BG, Uygun K, Yarmush ML, et al. Surgical models of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery and sleeve gastrectomy in rats and mice[J]. Nat Protoc, 2015, 10(3): 495-507.
[16]
Hao Z, Mumphrey MB, Townsend RL, et al. Body Composition, Food Intake, and Energy Expenditure in a Murine Model of Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Surgery[J].Obes Surg, 2016, 26(9): 2173-2182.
[1] 何金梅, 尹立雪, 谭静, 张文军, 王锐, 任梅, 廖明娇. 超声心肌做功技术对2型糖尿病患者潜在左心室心肌收缩功能损伤的评价[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1029-1035.
[2] 李晓晖, 上官昌盛, 向英, 裴芝皆, 车俊志, 谢飞. 3D腹腔镜袖状胃切除术后机体能量代谢与多囊卵巢综合征患者性激素水平关系[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 538-541.
[3] 聂锋, 李婉珍. 不打针不吃药不输液徒手治疗糖尿病一例报道[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 354-354.
[4] 唐英俊, 李华娟, 王赛妮, 徐旺, 刘峰, 李羲, 郝新宝, 黄华萍. 人脐带间充质干细胞治疗COPD小鼠及机制分析[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(04): 476-480.
[5] 牛朝, 李波, 张万福, 靳文帝, 王春晓, 李晓刚. 腹腔镜袖状胃切除联合胆囊切除治疗肥胖合并胆囊结石安全性和疗效[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 635-639.
[6] 薛念余, 张盛敏, 吴凌恒, 沙蕾, 童揽月, 沈崔琴, 李朝军, 杜联芳. 研究血清胆红素对2型糖尿病患者心脏结构发生改变前心肌功能的影响[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 1004-1009.
[7] 陶璐, 初楠, 韩洁, 白春英, 逄雯丽, 余海源. 血清PECAM-1、Sirt1水平与2型糖尿病患者颈动脉粥样硬化的关系[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 291-296.
[8] 韩家超, 王飞飞, 柳子宁, 胡冀陶, 孟泽松, 雒月云, 王贵英. 二甲双胍的作用机制研究进展[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 349-355.
[9] 苏慧媛, 宋洪涛, 高巍, 武忠. 针刺治疗单纯性肥胖的系统评价和Meta分析[J]. 中华针灸电子杂志, 2023, 12(03): 123-128.
[10] 董正妮, 张珑耀. 穴位埋线疗法治疗单纯性肥胖的研究进展[J]. 中华针灸电子杂志, 2023, 12(02): 57-61.
[11] 刘辉, 海燕, 李韶玲, 马玲玲. 基于康复理念机器人辅助袖状胃切除肥胖患者的集束化管理[J]. 中华胃食管反流病电子杂志, 2023, 10(02): 105-110.
[12] 汪赓, 夏泽锋, 陶凯雄. 代谢手术在非肥胖型2型糖尿病中的治疗效果及研究进展[J]. 中华肥胖与代谢病电子杂志, 2023, 09(03): 155-160.
[13] 李锦亮, 曾茂娟, 钟金宝, 何伟强, 林文新. 司美格鲁肽对肥胖2型糖尿病患者皮肤微循环功能的影响[J]. 中华肥胖与代谢病电子杂志, 2023, 09(03): 192-196.
[14] 刘澳, 周菁, 孙永兵, 和俊雅, 林新贝, 乔琦, 李中林, 张建成, 武肖玲, 邹智, 胡扬喜, 肖新广, 吕雪, 李昊, 李永丽. 减重代谢手术后神经影像改变与认知功能评估的研究进展[J]. 中华肥胖与代谢病电子杂志, 2023, 09(03): 203-208.
[15] 陈笑梅, 陈文辉, 赵宛鄂, 郭婕, 苏超, 付志菊, 杨华, 董志勇, 王存川. 可吞咽自吸收新型胃内球囊治疗轻度肥胖症:一例病例报告[J]. 中华肥胖与代谢病电子杂志, 2023, 09(03): 215-217.
阅读次数
全文


摘要