切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肥胖与代谢病电子杂志 ›› 2026, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (02) : 94 -102. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-9605.2026.02.002

论著

肥胖相关测量指标与糖尿病足溃疡及全因死亡风险的关联分析
刘冯园1, 杨丽萍1, 曾令永2,()   
  1. 1537000 玉林市,玉林市红十字会医院内分泌科
    2523660 东莞市,东莞市清溪医院内分泌科
  • 收稿日期:2026-03-11 出版日期:2026-05-31
  • 通信作者: 曾令永

Association analysis of obesity-related measurement indicators with the risk of diabetic foot ulcers and all-cause mortality

Fengyuan Liu1, Liping Yang1, Lingyong Zeng2,()   

  1. 1Department of Endocrinology, Yulin City Red Cross Hospital, Yulin 537000
    2Department of Endocrinology, Dongguan Qingxi Hospital, Dongguan 523660, China
  • Received:2026-03-11 Published:2026-05-31
  • Corresponding author: Lingyong Zeng
引用本文:

刘冯园, 杨丽萍, 曾令永. 肥胖相关测量指标与糖尿病足溃疡及全因死亡风险的关联分析[J/OL]. 中华肥胖与代谢病电子杂志, 2026, 12(02): 94-102.

Fengyuan Liu, Liping Yang, Lingyong Zeng. Association analysis of obesity-related measurement indicators with the risk of diabetic foot ulcers and all-cause mortality[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Obesity and Metabolic Diseases(Electronic Edition), 2026, 12(02): 94-102.

目的

探讨体重指数(BMI)、体重调整腰围指数(WWI)、身体圆度指数(BRI)和相对脂肪质量指数(RFM)与糖尿病足溃疡(DFU)及全因死亡风险之间的关系,为糖尿病患者风险分层提供依据。

方法

基于美国国家健康与营养调查(NHANES)1999~2004年数据,纳入年龄≥35岁的糖尿病患者1 487例。采用加权Logistic回归分析BMI、WWI、BRI和RFM与DFU及DFU前期状态的关联,采用ROC曲线和限制性立方样条分析各指标对DFU的判别能力及其非线性关系;通过链接国家死亡指数数据库,随访至2019年12月31日,并采用加权Cox比例风险回归分析各指标与全因死亡的关系。

结果

共纳入1 487例糖尿病患者,其中DFU 100例(6.7%),DFU前期状态733例(49.3%)。完全调整混杂因素后,BMI、WWI、BRI和RFM均与DFU风险升高显著相关,OR值分别为1.07、1.95、1.47和1.13;而上述指标与DFU前期状态均无显著关联。4项指标对DFU均具有中等判别效能,AUC约为0.71~0.72。RCS分析显示,WWI与DFU风险之间存在非线性关系。全因死亡分析显示,WWI、BRI和RFM与死亡风险升高显著相关,BMI相关性相对较弱,其中WWI和BRI在死亡风险分层中的表现更为突出。

结论

多项肥胖相关人体测量指标与糖尿病患者DFU风险升高显著相关,其中WWI和BRI还与全因死亡风险增加相关。简便、无创的人体测量指标有望用于识别DFU高危人群,并为早期预防和风险分层提供参考。

Objective

To explore the relationship between body mass index (BMI), weight-adjusted waist circumference index (WWI), body roundness index (BRI), and relative fat mass index (RFM) and the risk of diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) and all-cause mortality, and to provide a basis for risk stratification in diabetic patients.

Methods

Based on the data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) from 1999 to 2004, 1,487 diabetic patients aged ≥35 years were included. Weighted logistic regression was used to analyze the association between BMI, WWI, BRI, and RFM and DFU and the pre-DFU state. ROC curves and restricted cubic splines were used to analyze the discriminatory ability of each index for DFU and its non-linear relationship. By linking to the National Death Index database, the patients were followed up until December 31, 2019, and weighted Cox proportional hazards regression was used to analyze the relationship between each index and all-cause mortality.

Results

A total of 1,487 diabetic patients were included, among whom 100 (6.7%) had DFU and 733 (49.3%) were in the pre-DFU state. After fully adjusting for confounding factors, BMI, WWI, BRI, and RFM were all significantly associated with an increased risk of DFU, with OR values of 1.07, 1.95, 1.47, and 1.13, respectively; however, these indices were not significantly associated with the pre-DFU state. All four indices had moderate discriminatory power for DFU, with AUCs of approximately 0.71 to 0.72. RCS analysis showed a non-linear relationship between WWI and the risk of DFU. The analysis of all-cause mortality revealed that WWI, BRI, and RFM were significantly associated with an increased risk of death, while the association of BMI was relatively weak. Among them, WWI and BRI performed more prominently in the stratification of mortality risk.

Conclusion

Multiple obesity-related anthropometric indices are significantly associated with an increased risk of DFU in diabetic patients, and WWI and BRI are also associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality. Simple and non-invasive anthropometric indices are promising for identifying high-risk populations for DFU and providing references for early prevention and risk stratification.

表1 研究对象的基线特征
变量 总体(n=1487) 无糖尿病足溃疡(n=1387) 有糖尿病足溃疡(n=100) P
年龄(岁, ±s 62.51 (12.54) 62.52 (12.49) 62.31 (13.39) 0.872
族裔[例(%)]       0.605
墨西哥裔美国人 421 (28.3) 391 (28.2) 30 (30.0)  
非西班牙裔白人 586 (39.4) 544 (39.2) 42 (42.0)  
非西班牙裔黑人 354 (23.8) 331 (23.9) 23 (23.0)  
其他 126 (8.5) 121 (8.7) 5 (5.0)  
性别[例(%)]       0.001
795 (53.5) 725 (52.3) 70 (70.0)  
692 (46.5) 662 (47.7) 30 (30.0)  
受教育程度[例(%)]       0.546
高中以下 705 (47.4) 661 (47.7) 44 (44.0)  
高中及以上 782 (52.6) 726 (52.3) 56 (56.0)  
婚姻状况[例(%)]       0.255
已婚 905 (60.9) 850 (61.3) 55 (55.0)  
未婚 582 (39.1) 537 (38.7) 45 (45.0)  
经济状态[例(%)]       0.479
贫困 280 (18.8) 258 (18.6) 22 (22.0)  
非贫困 1 207 (81.2) 1129 (81.4) 78 (78.0)  
吸烟状况[例(%)]       0.143
1 245 (83.7) 1 167 (84.1) 78 (78.0)  
242 (16.3) 220 (15.9) 22 (22.0)  
饮酒状况[例(%)]       0.963
582 (39.1) 544 (39.2) 38 (38.0)  
843 (56.7) 785 (56.6) 58 (58.0)  
高血压[例(%)]       0.501
710 (47.7) 666 (48.0) 44 (44.0)  
777 (52.3) 721 (52.0) 56 (56.0)  
心血管疾病[例(%)]       0.001
1 149 (77.3) 1 086 (78.3) 63 (63.0)  
338 (22.7) 301 (21.7) 37 (37.0)  
高胆固醇血症[例(%)]       0.649
739 (49.7) 692 (49.9) 47 (47.0)  
748 (50.3) 695 (50.1) 53 (53.0)  
HbA1c(%) 7.54 (1.95) 7.48 (1.88) 8.35 (2.68) <0.001
UACR(mg/g) 17.24 (10.94) 16.97 (10.92) 21.09 (10.58) <0.001
CRP(mg/dL) 0.70 (1.44) 0.71 (1.48) 0.63 (0.73) 0.622
WBC 7.43 (2.05) 7.41 (2.06) 7.71 (1.92) 0.153
腰围WC(cm,±s 106.50 (14.58) 106.18 (14.31) 110.85 (17.45) 0.002
体重(kg,±s 86.22 (20.71) 85.89 (20.45) 90.73 (23.68) 0.024
身高(cm,±s 166.23 (9.85) 166.10 (9.92) 168.08 (8.55) 0.052
BMI(±s 31.10 (6.60) 31.03 (6.46) 32.11 (8.25) 0.113
RFM(%,±s 37.85 (8.04) 37.94 (8.06) 36.58 (7.71) 0.101
BRI(±s 5.96 (1.18) 5.95 (1.17) 6.08 (1.33) 0.285
WWI(cm/,±s 11.54 (0.74) 11.53 (0.75) 11.70 (0.61) 0.029
DFU前期状态[例(%)]       <0.001
754 (50.7) 654 (47.2) 100 (100.0)  
733 (49.3) 733 (52.8) 0 (0.0)  
表2 BMI、WWI、BRI和RFM作为连续变量与DFU及DFU前期状态的关联
表3 BMI、WWI、BRI和RFM作为分类变量与糖尿病足溃疡的关联
图1 BMI、WWI、BRI和RFM在预测糖尿病足病变方面的ROC曲线
图2 BMI(A)、BRI(B)、RFM(C)、WWI(D)与DFU之间关系的RCS曲线
图3 BMI、WWI、BRI、RFM与全因死亡的Kaplan-Meier生存曲线
[1]
何亚非, 张莉莉, 李娟, 等. 糖尿病足溃疡基础的研究进展 [J]. 中国糖尿病杂志, 2025, 33(08): 631-634.
[2]
翟筱涵, 王爱红, 母义明, 等. 糖尿病足感染病原学及抗感染治疗研究进展 [J]. 中华医院感染学杂志, 2024, 34(04): 635-640.
[3]
陈小燕, 李梅, 黄莎, 等. 肌少性肥胖与养老机构老年人死亡风险:基于六种肥胖指标的前瞻性队列研究 [J]. 中华老年医学杂志, 2025, 44(07): 943–950.
[4]
门航, 厉周, 韩帅, 等. 肥胖与2型糖尿病研究进展 [J]. 中华肥胖与代谢病电子杂志, 2025, 11(01): 62-69.
[5]
杨柏林, 陈积标, 尹寒露, 等. 体重调整腰围指数与不良健康结局关联的研究进展 [J]. 中华流行病学杂志, 2024, 45(10): 1455-1464.
[6]
王仁媛, 咸亚静, 蔡雯, 等. 人体肥胖测量指标对非酒精性脂肪性肝病的预测价值 [J]. 中华健康管理学杂志, 2023, 17(08): 591-597.
[7]
谢舒, 陈丹翔, 张艳艳, 等. 老年高血压人群相对脂肪质量指数与肾小球滤过率的相关性研究 [J]. 中华老年医学杂志, 2025, 44(10): 1414-1421.
[8]
Xiao B, Cao C, Han Y, et al. Non-linear relationship between relative fat mass and diabetes risk in Japanese adults: a retrospective cohort study [J]. Sci Rep, 2024, 14(1): 23496.
[9]
Li X, Huang Y, Chen M, et al. Correlation of weight-adjusted waist index with diabetic retinopathy in US adults aged ≥ 40 years: the NHANES 2005-2008 [J]. Sci Rep, 2024, 14(1): 19369.
[10]
Calderón-García JF, Roncero-Martín R, Rico-Martín S, et al. Effectiveness of Body Roundness Index (BRI) and a Body Shape Index (ABSI) in Predicting Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies [J]. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2021, 18(21): 11607.
[11]
Woolcott OO, Bergman RN. Relative fat mass (RFM) as a new estimator of whole-body fat percentage -A cross-sectional study in American adult individuals [J]. Sci Rep, 2018, 8(1): 10980.
[12]
Cao T, Xie R, Wang J, et al. Association of weight-adjusted waist index with all-cause mortality among non-Asian individuals: a national population-based cohort study [J]. Nutr J, 2024, 23(1): 62.
[13]
Fahami M, Hojati A, Farhangi MA, et al. Body shape index (ABSI), body roundness index (BRI) and risk factors of metabolic syndrome among overweight and obese adults: a cross-sectional study [J]. BMC Endocr Disord, 2024, 24(1): 230.
[1] 曾艺平, 刁雪山, 宁天华, 梁金莲, 谢举临, 胡志成, 唐锦明, 谢肖霞, 李延甫. 抗生素骨水泥填充治疗糖尿病足骨髓炎的临床疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2026, 21(04): 271-276.
[2] 冯颖, 祝红娟, 王倩, 高猛猛, 郭佳宁, 马妍. 负压伤口疗法联合生物活性敷料在糖尿病足溃疡中的应用研究进展[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2026, 21(04): 309-314.
[3] 牛磊, 褚万立, 魏茜, 石志远, 申传安. 糖尿病足溃疡患者营养管理的系统评估与精准干预[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2026, 21(01): 54-57.
[4] 廖睿, 查天建, 刘小龙. RNA结合蛋白在糖尿病足溃疡中作用的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2026, 21(01): 75-79.
[5] 谭进富, 管春菠, 朱文. 腹腔镜下袖状胃切除术[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 175-175.
[6] 王伦, 周昕, 宁伟伟, 杨清旭, 胡旭, 何诣航, 谢铭. 我国腹腔镜减重代谢手术后营养不良及管理[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(01): 9-11.
[7] 周哲琦, 艾克拜尔·艾力, 李义亮, 麦麦提艾力·麦麦提明, 玉素江·图荪托合提, 克力木·阿不都热依木. 机器人辅助与腹腔镜袖状胃切除联合胃底折叠及食管裂孔疝修补术的临床疗效[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 259-264.
[8] 王, 冯恺源, 杨焮宇, 李鑫, 王芳, 胡褒曼, 曹国强, 李力. 基于CT量化评估胸部主要解剖单元病征的慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者5年全因死亡风险预测模型研究[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2026, 19(02): 240-246.
[9] 王家轩, 苟浩博, 魏秋亚, 高田宇, 樊勇. 单孔袖状胃切除联合单吻合口胃回肠转流术的临床疗效[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 19(02): 110-114.
[10] 赵媛媛, 李云雷, 杜鹏. 缺氧环境下肥胖相关蛋白对胶质母细胞瘤增殖的作用及机制研究[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2026, 12(02): 73-80.
[11] 马博, 李涛, 董扬帆, 商少华, 马华, 王俊, 纪文静. 减重代谢手术改善2型糖尿病肥胖患者胃肠肽及血糖的前瞻性研究[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2026, 16(01): 53-60.
[12] 郭楠, 李珊珊, 赵丹, 薛露露, 李宇, 李炎妮, 杨彩彩, 贾爱华. TyG-BMI与WHtR评估超重及肥胖人群内脏脂肪面积的价值及诊断切点[J/OL]. 中华肥胖与代谢病电子杂志, 2026, 12(02): 85-93.
[13] 张晓会, 刘芳, 刁英飞, 李岳瀛, 李艳玲. 基于人体成分分析探讨相位角与腹型肥胖的关联研究[J/OL]. 中华肥胖与代谢病电子杂志, 2026, 12(01): 9-15.
[14] 吴舒薇, 伍俊蓉, 刘冯园. 玛仕度肽对糖尿病及非糖尿病肥胖人群减重疗效和安全性的Meta分析[J/OL]. 中华肥胖与代谢病电子杂志, 2026, 12(01): 50-61.
[15] 杨磊, 熊见武, 沈宗文, 陈熊熊, 李滢旭. 腹腔镜胃袖状切除术后门静脉-肠系膜静脉血栓形成1例报道[J/OL]. 中华肥胖与代谢病电子杂志, 2026, 12(01): 72-77.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?