切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"
高级检索
中华肥胖与代谢病电子杂志

中华肥胖与代谢病电子杂志 ›› 2023, Vol. 09 ›› Issue (01) : 4 -11. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-9605.2023.01.002

论著

腹腔镜袖状胃切除术中胃窦切缘与幽门的距离对术后胃食管反流病及减重效果的影响
伍振鹏, 乔钰涵, 向林, 江云颂, 彭居正, 吴丽娜, 程吕佳, 关炳生, 庄子康, 杨景哥†()   
  1. 510630　广州，暨南大学附属第一医院胃肠外科一区
  • 收稿日期:2022-12-28 出版日期:2023-02-28
  • 通信作者: 杨景哥
  • 基金资助:
    广州市科技计划项目资助(202201020064); 广东省自然科学基金(2017A030313855)

Effect of different antrum margin to pylorus distance on postoperative gastroesophageal reflux disease and weight loss in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy

Zhenpeng Wu, Yuhan Qiao, Lin Xiang, Yunsong Jiang, Junzheng Peng, Lina Wu, Lvjia Cheng, Bingsheng Guan, Zikang Zhuang, Jingge Yang†()   

  1. Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou 510630, China
  • Received:2022-12-28 Published:2023-02-28
  • Corresponding author: Jingge Yang
全文 ( ) 下载PDF ( ) 导出引用
引用本文：

伍振鹏, 乔钰涵, 向林, 江云颂, 彭居正, 吴丽娜, 程吕佳, 关炳生, 庄子康, 杨景哥. 腹腔镜袖状胃切除术中胃窦切缘与幽门的距离对术后胃食管反流病及减重效果的影响[J]. 中华肥胖与代谢病电子杂志, 2023, 09(01): 4-11.

Zhenpeng Wu, Yuhan Qiao, Lin Xiang, Yunsong Jiang, Junzheng Peng, Lina Wu, Lvjia Cheng, Bingsheng Guan, Zikang Zhuang, Jingge Yang. Effect of different antrum margin to pylorus distance on postoperative gastroesophageal reflux disease and weight loss in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy[J]. Chinese Journal of Obesity and Metabolic Diseases(Electronic Edition), 2023, 09(01): 4-11.

目的

探讨腹腔镜袖状胃切除术（LSG）中不同胃窦切缘与幽门的距离对术后胃食管反流病（GERD）和减重效果之间的关系。

方法

采取单中心前瞻性随机对照研究，纳入2018年3月至2019年3月在暨南大学附属第一医院接受LSG的肥胖症患者45例，并将其随机平均分为3组，分别为G1组：胃窦切缘距幽门2 cm；G2组：胃窦切缘距幽门4 cm；G3组：胃窦切缘距幽门6 cm。在LSG术前以及术后的1月、3月、6月和1年采集相关数据，包括体重、BMI、多余体重减少百分比（%EWL）、总体重减轻百分比（%TWL）、胃食管反流病健康相关生活质量问卷（GERD-HRQL）评分等，并进行分析。

结果

各组间术后1月、3月、6月及1年体重、BMI下降和%TWL变化差异均有统计学意义（P<0.05）。在GERD-HRQL评分中，与术前相比，各组间术后1月的总分及胃灼热分数均明显升高（P<0.05）。术前2例伴有GERD的患者术后症状均有所改善。术后1年随访中发现了6例新发的GERD，分别为：G1组1例，G2组3例和G3组2例，各组间GERD的发生差异无统计学意义。单因素分析结果提示手术方案与术后体重变化明显相关：G1组术后平均BMI下降和术后平均%TWL的变化较G2和G3两组明显，差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。

结论

LSG术后患者GERD-HRQL评分总体呈上升趋势，但不同的胃窦切缘距离与术后GERD的发生无显著相关性。相比于4 cm和6 cm，胃窦切缘距幽门2 cm可能是LSG术后获得更好减重效果的安全距离。

关键词: 腹腔镜袖状胃切除术, 胃窦切缘距离, 胃食管反流病, 肥胖症, 减重手术
Objective

To investigate the effect of the distance between gastric antrum margin and pylorus in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) on postoperative gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and weight loss.

Methods

A single-center prospective randomized controlled study was used. 45 patients who received LSG during March 2018 to March 2019 were included. Patients were equally divided into 3 groups according to the distance between antral margin and pylorus by computerized random grouping method: G1 (2 cm), G2 (4 cm), and G3 (6 cm). Data were collected and analyzed before and 1 month, 3 months, 6 months and 1 year after LSG.

Results

There were statistically significant differences in the postoperative BMI decrease and %TWL between the groups (P<0.05). The postoperative symptoms of 2 patients with GERD before surgery were improved. There have 6 patients were new-onset of the GERD after 1 year of follow-up. In the GERD-HRQL score, the total score and heartburn score at 1 month after surgery were significantly higher among all groups compared with those before surgery (P<0.05). Compared with G2 and G3 groups, the average postoperative BMI decreased and the average %TWL increased more significantly in G1 group, with statistically significant differences (P<0.05).

Conclusions

This study found that postoperative GERD-HRQL scores have generally increase. Yet, there was no significant correlation between different antral margin distances and the occurrence of postoperative GERD. Compared with 4 cm and 6 cm, 2 cm between antral margin and pylorus may be a safe distance to achieve better weight loss after LSG.

Key words: Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy, Incisal margin of antrum, Gastroesophageal reflux disease, Obesity, Bariatric surgery
表1 三组患者术前一般资料
基本特征 总人群 G1组（距幽门2 cm） G2组（距幽门4 cm） G3组（距幽门6 cm） P值
总例数 45 15 15 15  
男女比例 13/32 4/11 2/13 7/8 0.087
身高（cm） 160.51±9.74 159.9±9.65 158.44±10.18 161.81±9.76 0.000*
体重（kg） 99.90±19.12 104.31±20.94 96.19±19.33 99.19±17.36 0.803
BMI（kg/m2） 38.89 ± 5.81 40.67±6.54 38.00± 4.15 38.00±6.41 0.800
吸烟史 12(26.7%) 2 (13.3%) 3(20%) 7(46.7%) 0.196
胃食管反流症 2(4.4%) 0 1(6.7%) 1(6.7%) 0.253
食管炎 2(4.4%) 0 1(6.7%) 1(6.7%) 0.253
食管炎分级 2例LA-A级 - LA-A级 LA-A级  
图1 减重手术前后各组间体重指标和反流评分变化趋势。1A-1H分别表示各组间体重、BMI、BMI下降值、%EWL、%TWL、GERD-HRQL评分总分、胃灼热分数、反流分数变化的变化趋势
表2 G1组（距幽门2 cm）LSG术后随访结果
基本特征 术前 术后1月 术后3月 术后半年 术后1年
体重（kg） 104.31±20.94 82.15±17.10* 77.07±15.04* 70.49±13.05* 64.40±11.57*
BMI（kg/m2） 40.67±6.54 31.92±4.59* 30.07±4.85* 27.52±4.26* 24.27±2.60*
BMI的变化（kg/m2）   8.74±2.98 10.60±1.89 13.14±2.62 16.40± 4.57
%EWL   63.51±31.94 80.79±41.26 98.83±46.79 117.75±41.94
%TWL   21.13±5.25 26.04±1.87 32.20±2.62 39.66±5.32
GERD-HRQL评分          
总分 2.00±4.52 6.33±2.02* 3.67±6.7 8.20±7.23* 3.33±3.97
胃灼热分数 0.60±1.84 2.53±0.99* 1.60±1.76* 3.33±3.26* 0.4±1.29
反流分数 1.53±3.11 2.73±0.79 1.33±3.33 3.80±4.87 1.33±1.63
表3 G2组（距幽门4 cm）LSG术后随访结果
基本特征 术前 术后1月 术后3月 术后半年 术后1年
体重（kg） 96.19±19.32 78.85±15.38 72.47±13.53 65.93±11.83 62.38±10.30
BMI（kg/m2） 38.00±4.15 31.24±4.05 28.71±3.45 28.71±3.45 24.76±2.39
BMI的变化（kg/m2）   6.77±1.88 9.29±1.69 11.85±2.89 13.25±2.93
%EWL   56.39±23.67 77.04±23.58 96.10±28.05 106.53±19.70
%TWL   17.86±4.96 24.46±3.60 30.99±6.09 34.58±5.00
GERD-HRQL评分          
总分 1.20±1.90 7.00±8.72* 4.93±12.96 6.00±10.64 5.13±8.36
胃灼热分数 0 1.80±2.88* 1.73±3.99* 2.27±4.03* 2.20±4.06*
反流分数 1.20±1.90 4.00±4.19* 2.00±5.52 2.27±4.10 2.33±3.77
表4 G3组（距幽门6 cm）LSG术后随访结果
基本特征 术前 术后1月 术后3月 术后半年 术后1年
体重（kg） 99.20±17.36 81.90±14.42* 77.20±13.03* 72.27±12.66* 67.63±12.82*
BMI（kg/m2） 38.00±6.41 31.23±4.28* 29.48±4.15* 27.63±4.460* 25.77±4.08*
BMI的变化（kg/m2）   6.77±2.74 8.52±2.67 10.36±2.38 12.22±3.69
%EWL   58.72±23.46 76.99±35.42 96.96±47.84 106.46±30.11
%TWL   17.31±4.89 22.01±3.95 27.09±3.38 31.67±6.92
GERD-HRQL评分          
总分 2.53±3.23 10.47±5.41* 4.87±5.32 6.33±5.341* 2.73±4.99
胃灼热分数 0.87±1.89 3.00±2.88* 1.87±1.64 2.6±3.47* 0.4±1.549*
反流分数 1.40±1.72 6.33±1.59* 2.33±3.68 3.47±2.64 1.6±3.04
表3 不同胃窦切缘距离与减重效果及GERD相关性分析
相关因素 不同胃窦切缘距离
r值 P值
体重（kg） 0.173 0.255
BMI（kg/m2） 0.126 0.410
BMI的变化（kg/m2） -0.381 0.010*
%EWL -0.078 0.613
%TWL -0.583 0.000*
胃食管反流病 -0.080 0.601
GERD-HRQL评分    
总分 -0.222 0.142
胃灼热分数 -0.057 0.710
反流分数 0.080 0.601
表4 不同胃窦切缘距离对减重效果的影响
手术方案 体重 BMI BMI的变化 %TWL %EWL
Z P Z P Z P Z P Z P
G1 vs. G2 -0.083 0.935 -0.436 0.683 -1.970 0.049* -0.311 0.001* -0.311 0.775
G1 vs. G3 -1.101 0.285 -0.809 0.419 -2.426 0.015* -03.422 0.001* -0.601 0.548
G2 vs. G3 -1.142 0.267 -0.436 0.683 -0.726 0.486 -1.597 0.116 -0.021 1.00
统计值 χ2 P χ2 P χ2 P χ2 P χ2 P
1.696 0.428 0.696 0.706 6.923 0.031* 15.685 0.000* 0.293 0.864
表5 不同胃窦切缘距离对术后GERD的影响
手术方案 总分 胃灼热分数 反流分数
Z P Z P Z P
G1 vs. G2 -0.364 0.744 -1.683 0.202 -0.340 0.775
G1 vs. G3 -1.332 0.233 -0.518 0.605 -0.901 0.368
G2 vs. G3 -1.469 0.1187 -2.101 0.126 -0.817 0.512
统计值 χ2 P χ2 P χ2 P
2.543 0.280 5.808 0.055 1.015 0.602
[1]
Blüher M. Obesity: global epidemiology and pathogenesis [J]. Nat Rev Endocrinol, 2019, 15(5): 288-298.
[2]
NCD Risk Factor Collaboration (NCD-RisC). Worldwide trends in body-mass index, underweight, overweight, and obesity from 1975 to 2016: a pooled analysis of 2416 population-based measurement studies in 128.9 million children, adolescents, and adults [J]. Lancet, 2017, 390(10113): 2627-2642.
[3]
Piché ME, Tchernof A, Després JP. Obesity Phenotypes, Diabetes, and Cardiovascular Diseases [J]. Circ Res, 2020, 126(11):1477-1500.
[4]
Arterburn DE, Telem DA, Kushner RF, et al. Benefits and Risks of Bariatric Surgery in Adults: A Review [J]. JAMA, 2020, 324(9): 879-887.
[5]
olquitt JL, Pickett K, Loveman E, et al. Surgery for weight loss in adults [J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2014, 2014(8): CD003641.
[6]
English WJ, DeMaria EJ, Brethauer SA, et al. American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery estimation of metabolic and bariatric procedures performed in the United States in 2016 [J]. Surg Obes Relat Dis, 2018, 14(3): 259-263.
[7]
李世星, 姜涛, 于洋. 腹腔镜袖状胃切除术治疗肥胖型2型糖尿病的疗效分析 [J/CD]. 中华肥胖与代谢病电子杂志, 2017, 3(4): 215-219.
[8]
Tack J, Deloose E. Complications of bariatric surgery: dumping syndrome, reflux and vitamin deficiencies [J]. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol, 2014, 28(4): 741-749.
[9]
Katzka DA, Kahrilas PJ. Advances in the diagnosis and management of gastroesophageal reflux disease [J]. BMJ, 2020, 371: m3786.
[10]
Gyawali CP, Kahrilas PJ, Savarino E, et al. Modern diagnosis of GERD: the Lyon Consensus [J]. GUT, 2018, 67(7): 1351-1362.
[11]
El-Serag HB, Graham DY, Satia JA, et al. Obesity is an independent risk factor for GERD symptoms and erosive esophagitis [J]. Am J Gastroenterol, 2005, 100(6): 1243-1250.
[12]
Anand G, Katz PO. Gastroesophageal reflux disease and obesity [J]. Gastroenterol Clin North Am, 2010, 39(1): 39-46.
[13]
Yuan S, Larsson SC. Adiposity, diabetes, lifestyle factors and risk of gastroesophageal reflux disease: a Mendelian randomization study [J]. Eur J Epidemiol, 2022, 37(7): 747-754.
[14]
Sucandy I, Chrestiana D, Bonanni F, et al. Gastroesophageal Reflux Symptoms After Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy for Morbid Obesity. The Importance of Preoperative Evaluation and Selection [J]. N Am J Med Sci, 2015, 7(5): 189-193.
[15]
Carabotti M, Silecchia G, Greco F, et al. Impact of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy on upper gastrointestinal symptoms [J]. Obes Surg, 2013, 23(10): 1551-1557.
[16]
Daes J, Jimenez ME, Said N, Dennis R. Improvement of gastroesophageal reflux symptoms after standardized laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy [J]. Obes Surg, 2014, 24(4): 536-540.
[17]
刘彦旸, 姚琪远. 腹腔镜袖状胃切除术后胃食管反流病的治疗进展 [J/CD]. 中华肥胖与代谢病电子杂志, 2019, 5(4): 205-208.
[18]
Hayat JO, Wan A. The effects of sleeve gastectomy on gastro-esophageal reflux and gastro-esophageal motility [J]. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2014, 8(4): 445-452.
[19]
Oor JE, Roks DJ, ünlü Ç, et al. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and gastroesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. Am J Surg, 2016, 211(1): 250-267.
[20]
Yormaz S, Yılmaz H, Ece I, et al. Midterm Clinical Outcomes of Antrum Resection Margin at Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy for Morbid Obesity [J]. Obes Surg, 2017, 27(4): 910-916.
[21]
中华医学会肠外肠内营养学分会营养与代谢协作组, 北京协和医院减重多学科协作组. 减重手术的营养与多学科管理专家共识 [J]. 中华外科杂志, 2018, 56(2): 81-90.
[22]
高歌, 艾自胜. 使用计算机随机分组与随机抽样的方法及应用 [J]. 中国卫生统计, 2002, 1: 48-49.
[23]
Velanovich V. The development of the GERD-HRQL symptom severity instrument [J]. Dis Esophagus, 2007, 20(2): 130-134.
[24]
Korner J, Inabnet W, Febres G, et al. Prospective study of gut hormone and metabolic changes after adjustable gastric banding and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass [J]. Int J Obes (Lond), 2009, 33(7): 786-795.
[25]
Valderas JP, Irribarra V, Boza C, et al. Medical and surgical treatments for obesity have opposite effects on peptide YY and appetite: a prospective study controlled for weight loss [J]. J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 2010, 95(3): 1069-1075.
[26]
van de Laar AW, Acherman YI. Weight loss percentile charts of large representative series: a benchmark defining sufficient weight loss challenging current criteria for success of bariatric surgery [J]. Obes Surg, 2014, 24(5): 727-734.
[27]
Ionut V, Burch M, Youdim A, et al. Gastrointestinal hormones and bariatric surgery-induced weight loss [J]. Obesity (Silver Spring), 2013, 21(6): 1093-1103.
[28]
De Groot NL, Burgerhart JS, Van De Meeberg PC, et al. Systematic review: the effects of conservative and surgical treatment for obesity on gastro-oesophageal reflux disease [J]. Aliment Pharmacol Ther, 2009, 30(11-12): 1091-1102.
[29]
Tai CM, Lee YC, Wu MS, et al. The effect of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass on gastroesophageal reflux disease in morbidly obese Chinese patients [J]. Obes Surg, 2009, 19(5): 565-570.
[30]
Perry Y, Courcoulas AP, Fernando HC, et al. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for recalcitrant gastroesophageal reflux disease in morbidly obese patients [J]. JSLS, 2004, 8(1): 19-23.
[31]
Ayazi S, Hagen JA, Chan LS, et al. Obesity and gastroesophageal reflux: quantifying the association between body mass index, esophageal acid exposure, and lower esophageal sphincter status in a large series of patients with reflux symptoms [J]. J Gastrointest Surg, 2009, 13(8): 1440-1447.
[32]
Himpens J, Dapri G, Cadière GB. A prospective randomized study between laparoscopic gastric banding and laparoscopic isolated sleeve gastrectomy: results after 1 and 3 years [J]. Obes Surg, 2006, 16(11): 1450-1456.
[33]
Melissas J, Leventi A, Klinaki I, et al. Alterations of global gastrointestinal motility after sleeve gastrectomy: a prospective study [J]. Ann Surg, 2013, 258(6): 976-982.
[34]
Shah S, Shah P, Todkar J, et al. Prospective controlled study of effect of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy on small bowel transit time and gastric emptying half-time in morbidly obese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus [J]. Surg Obes Relat Dis, 2010, 6(2): 152-1577.
[35]
Sucandy I, Chrestiana D, Bonanni F, et al. Gastroesophageal Reflux Symptoms After Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy for Morbid Obesity. The Importance of Preoperative Evaluation and Selection [J]. N Am J Med Sci, 2015, 7(5): 189-193.
[36]
McGlone ER, Gupta AK, Reddy M, et al. Antral resection versus antral preservation during laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy for severe obesity: Systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. Surg Obes Relat Dis, 2018, 14(6): 857-864.
[1] 纪凯伦, 郝少龙, 孙海涛, 韩威. 减重术后胆囊结石形成机制的新进展[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 100-103.
[2] 李晓晖, 上官昌盛, 向英, 裴芝皆, 车俊志, 谢飞. 3D腹腔镜袖状胃切除术后机体能量代谢与多囊卵巢综合征患者性激素水平关系[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 538-541.
[3] 聂锋, 李婉珍. 不打针不吃药不输液徒手治疗糖尿病一例报道[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 354-354.
[4] 贾卓奇, 周维茹, 张勇, 张广健, 付军科. 达·芬奇机器人与腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术的对比研究[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 410-414.
[5] 苏慧媛, 宋洪涛, 高巍, 武忠. 针刺治疗单纯性肥胖的系统评价和Meta分析[J]. 中华针灸电子杂志, 2023, 12(03): 123-128.
[6] 董正妮, 张珑耀. 穴位埋线疗法治疗单纯性肥胖的研究进展[J]. 中华针灸电子杂志, 2023, 12(02): 57-61.
[7] 张继舜, 陈思旭, 钱洁, 尚占民, 郝建宇. 平均夜间基线阻抗对食管外症状胃食管反流病的临床诊断价值[J]. 中华胃肠内镜电子杂志, 2023, 10(02): 97-102.
[8] 马俊蓉, 叶艳彬. 减重手术后的营养管理与复胖：现状与思考[J]. 中华肥胖与代谢病电子杂志, 2023, 09(03): 165-172.
[9] 范晓轩, 王娜, 朱丽花, 王亮. 肥胖相关肿瘤研究进展[J]. 中华肥胖与代谢病电子杂志, 2023, 09(03): 173-178.
[10] 肖莹莹, 田茵琦, 彭雪梅. 减重手术胃肠道血流量下降的原因及干预措施[J]. 中华肥胖与代谢病电子杂志, 2023, 09(03): 179-185.
[11] 刘澳, 周菁, 孙永兵, 和俊雅, 林新贝, 乔琦, 李中林, 张建成, 武肖玲, 邹智, 胡扬喜, 肖新广, 吕雪, 李昊, 李永丽. 减重代谢手术后神经影像改变与认知功能评估的研究进展[J]. 中华肥胖与代谢病电子杂志, 2023, 09(03): 203-208.
[12] 陈笑梅, 陈文辉, 赵宛鄂, 郭婕, 苏超, 付志菊, 杨华, 董志勇, 王存川. 可吞咽自吸收新型胃内球囊治疗轻度肥胖症：一例病例报告[J]. 中华肥胖与代谢病电子杂志, 2023, 09(03): 215-217.
[13] 闫文貌, 韩威, 白日星. 减重与代谢手术中被忽视的脾上极动脉[J]. 中华肥胖与代谢病电子杂志, 2023, 09(02): 92-94.
[14] 闫海, 邵怡凯, 姚琪远. 减重代谢外科在心血管疾病防治中的临床意义与前景[J]. 中华肥胖与代谢病电子杂志, 2023, 09(02): 137-142.
[15] 佟鑫, 何毅, 周莹, 付强. 腹腔镜袖状胃切除术治疗肥胖合并风湿性心脏病患者麻醉管理一例[J]. 中华肥胖与代谢病电子杂志, 2023, 09(02): 143-145.
阅读次数
全文


摘要

版权所有 中华医学会 中华医学电子音像出版社有限责任公司  京ICP备14006079号-1  网络出版服务许可证：(署)网出证(京)字第075号