切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"
高级检索
中华肥胖与代谢病电子杂志

中华肥胖与代谢病电子杂志 ›› 2021, Vol. 07 ›› Issue (04) : 227 -231. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-9605.2021.04.002

论著

腹横肌平面阻滞减轻袖状胃切除患者术后急性疼痛及预防术后慢性疼痛
朱俊俊1, 黄春霞1, 胡宪文1,†()   
  1. 1. 230601　合肥，安徽医科大学第二附属医院麻醉科
  • 收稿日期:2021-10-05 出版日期:2021-11-30
  • 通信作者: 胡宪文
  • 基金资助:
    2018年度国家青年科学基金项目(81801050)

Transversus abdominis plane block reduce postoperative acute pain and prevents chronic post-surgical pain after sleeve gastrectomy.

Junjun Zhu1, Chunxia Huang1, Xianwen Hu1,†()   

  1. 1. Department of Anesthesiology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei 230601, China
  • Received:2021-10-05 Published:2021-11-30
  • Corresponding author: Xianwen Hu
全文 ( ) 下载PDF ( ) 导出引用
引用本文：

朱俊俊, 黄春霞, 胡宪文. 腹横肌平面阻滞减轻袖状胃切除患者术后急性疼痛及预防术后慢性疼痛[J]. 中华肥胖与代谢病电子杂志, 2021, 07(04): 227-231.

Junjun Zhu, Chunxia Huang, Xianwen Hu. Transversus abdominis plane block reduce postoperative acute pain and prevents chronic post-surgical pain after sleeve gastrectomy.[J]. Chinese Journal of Obesity and Metabolic Diseases(Electronic Edition), 2021, 07(04): 227-231.

目的

研究腹横肌平面（TAP）阻滞对减重患者术后急性疼痛、术后慢性疼痛（CPSP）以及术后恢复的作用。

方法

选择2019年11月至2020年11月于安徽医科大学第二附属医院行腹腔镜袖状胃切除术（LSG）的肥胖症患者，按麻醉方法不同随机分为全麻组（GA组）和全麻联合腹横肌平面阻滞组（TAP组），每组各75例。比较两组术后1 h、6 h、12 h、24 h的视觉模拟评分（VAS）、术后48 h内镇痛泵有效按压次数、术后病房补救镇痛发生率、术后恶心、呕吐发生率、术后3 d PSQI评分和术后3、6个月CPSP发生率。其中CPSP数据通过电话随访获取。

结果

与GA组相比，TAP组术后1 h、6 h、12 h、24 h的VAS评分明显降低，术后48 h内镇痛泵有效按压次数及术后病房补救镇痛发生率明显减少，PONV发生率明显降低，术后3 d PSQI评分明显降低（P<0.05）。TAP组术后3、6个月CPSP发生率明显低于GA组（P<0.05）。

结论

TAP阻滞运用于减重手术可以有效地减轻术后急性疼痛，减少阿片类药物用量，改善术后睡眠质量。TAP阻滞可能预防减重患者术后慢性疼痛的发生。

关键词: 腹横肌平面阻滞, 腹腔镜袖状胃切除术, 术后急性疼痛, 术后慢性疼痛, 睡眠障碍
Objective

To study the effect of transversus abdominal plane (TAP) block on acute postoperative pain, chronic post-surgical pain (CPSP) and postoperative recovery of weight loss patients.

Methods

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy was performed in the Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University from November 2019 to November 2020. The patients were randomly divided into general anesthesia group (GA group) and general anesthesia combined with transverse abdominal muscle plane block group (TAP group), with 75 cases in each group. The visual analogue Scale (VAS), effective pressure times of analgesia pump within 48 hours after operation, incidence of remedial analgesia in postoperative ward, post-operative nausea and number of vomiting (PONV), Pittsburgh sleep quality index (PSQI) score 3 days after operation and CPSP incidence 3 and 6 months after operation were compared between the two groups. Among them, CPSP data were obtained by telephone follow-up.

Results

Compared with GA group, VAS scores in TAP group decreased significantly at 1, 6, 12, 24 hours after operation, the effective times of analgesia pump and the incidence of remedial analgesia in postoperative ward decreased significantly within 48 hours after operation, and the incidence of PONV decreased significantly after operation. The 3 days after operation PSQI score decreased significantly (P<0.05). The incidence of CPSP in TAP group was significantly lower than that in GA group at 3 and 6 months after operation (P<0.05).

Conclusions

TAP block can effectively reduce postoperative acute pain, reduce the dosage of opioids, improve postoperative sleep quality. TAP block may prevent postoperative chronic pain in patients with weight loss.

Key words: Transversus abdominis plane block, Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy, Postoperative acute pain, Chronic post-surgical pain, Sleep disorders
表2 两组患者术后急性疼痛比较
指标 GA组 TAP组 χ2/t值 P值
VSA评分        
术后1 h 2.2±1.2 1.5±1.2 5.1 <0.01
术后6 h 2.0±1.1 1.3±1.0 4.1 <0.01
术后12 h 1.9±0.7 1.3±1.1 3.6 <0.01
术后24 h 1.1±1.1 0.6±1.1 2.9 <0.05
术后48 h 0.3±0.8 0.2±0.8 0.5 >0.05
48 h内镇疼泵有效按压次数（次） 4.2±5.6 2.3±3.1 2.8 <0.05
病房补救镇痛发生率（例/%） 25（33） 12（16） 6.8 <0.01
表1 两组患者一般资料及术中资料比较
指标 GA组 TAP组 χ2/t值 P值
例数 75 75    
性别（男/女，例） 20/55 19/56 0.04 >0.05
年龄（岁） 32.4±7.3 30.4±7.5 1.6 >0.05
BMI（kg/m2） 42.2±6.1 43.3±7.5 1.2 >0.05
ASA I/II级（例） 26/49 22/53 0.5 >0.05
高血压（例/%） 44（58.7） 48（64.0） 0.5 >0.05
高血糖（例/%） 36（48.0） 34（45.3） 0.1 >0.05
高血脂（例/%） 59（78.7） 62（82.7） 0.4 >0.05
手术时长（min） 88.9±20.3 85.2±22.3 1.0 >0.05
术中丙泊酚用量（mg） 427.8±145.2 313.3±118.7 5.3 <0.01
术中瑞芬太尼用量（mg） 1.6±0.6 1.1±0.4 6.4 <0.01
术中右美托咪定用量（μg） 68.1±16.3 67.4±17.5 0.3 >0.05
表3 两组患者术后恢复结果
指标 GA组 TAP组 χ2/t值 P值
术后3 d PSQI评分 6.9±3.0 5.5±2.9 3.1 <0.05
PONV（例/%） 20（34） 10（13） 9.4 <0.05
术后首次下床活动时间（h） 34.5±13.3 33.9±12.4 0.3 >0.05
术后住院时间（d） 3.8±1.4 3.5±0.7 1.9 >0.05
术后慢性疼痛（例/%）        
术后3个月 22（29） 10（13） 5.7 <0.05
术后6个月 15（20） 6（8） 4.5 <0.05
[1]
Damsgaard CT, Michaelsen KF, Molbo D, et al. Trends in adult body-mass index in 200 countries from 1975 to 2014: A pooled analysis of 1698 population-based measurement studies with 19.2 million participants [J]. The Lancet, 2016, 387(10026): 1377-1396.
[2]
杨华, 陈缘, 董志勇, 等. 中国肥胖代谢外科数据库: 2020年度报告[J/CD]. 中华肥胖与代谢病电子杂志, 2021,7(1):1-7.
[3]
Fldi M, Soós A, Hegyi P, et al. Transversus abdominis plane block appears to be effective and safe as a part of multimodal analgesia in bariatric surgery: A meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized controlled trials [J]. Obesity Surgery, 2021, 31(2): 531-543.
[4]
Mark J, Argentieri DM, Gutierrez CA, et al. Ultrarestrictive opioid prescription protocol for pain management after gynecologic and abdominal surgery [J]. Jama Network Open, 2018, 1(8): e185452.
[5]
Baeriswyl M, Zeiter F, Piubellini D, et al. The analgesic efficacy of transverse abdominis plane block versus epidural analgesia: A systematic review with meta-analysis [J]. Medicine, 2018, 97: e11261.
[6]
Ghiasi F, Ghaleh BA, Salami , et al. Effects of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass on the improvement of sleep quality, daytime sleepiness, and obstructive sleep apnea in a six-month follow-up [J]. Tanaffos, 2020, 19(1): 50-59.
[7]
Schug SA, Lavand'homme P, Barke A, et al. The IASP classification of chronic pain for ICD-11: chronic postsurgical or posttraumatic pain [J]. Pain, 2018, 160(1): 45-52.
[8]
Rafi AN. Abdominal field block: A new approach via the lumbar triangle [J]. Anaesthesia, 2001, 56(10): 1024-1026.
[9]
Ruiz-Tovar J, Garcia A, Ferrigni C, et al. Laparoscopic-Guided Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) Block as Part of Multi-modal Analgesia in Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Within an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Program: a Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial [J]. Obesity Surgery, 2018, 28(11): 3374-3379.
[10]
Hebbard P, Fujiwara Y, Shibata Y, et al. Ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block [J]. Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, 2007, 35(4): 616-617.
[11]
Hebbard PD, Barrington MJ, Vasey C. Ultrasound-guided continuous oblique subcostal transversus abdominis plane blockade: Description of anatomy and clinical technique [J]. Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine, 2010, 35(5): 436-441.
[12]
McCarthy RJ, Ivankovich KG, Ramirez EA, et al. Association of the addition of a transversus abdominis plane block to an enhanced recovery program with opioid consumption, postoperative antiemetic use, and discharge time in patients undergoing laparoscopic bariatric surgery: A retrospective study [J]. Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, 2020, 45(3): 180-186.
[13]
Ruiz-Tovar J, Garcia A, Ferrigni C, et al. Laparoscopic-Guided transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block as part of multimodal analgesia in laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass within an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program: A prospective randomized clinical trial [J]. Obesity Surgery, 2018, 28(11): 3374-3379.
[14]
Tarun M, Ashish D, Rahul S, et al. Efficacy of ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block for postoperative analgesia in laparoscopic gastric sleeve resection: A randomized single blinded case control study [J]. Surgical Endoscopy, 2018, 32(12): 4985-4989.
[15]
Helene B, Bruno L, Cedric M, et al. POFA trial study protocol: A multicentre, double-blind, randomised, controlled clinical trial comparing opioid-free versus opioid anaesthesia on postoperative opioid-related adverse events after major or intermediate non-cardiac surgery [J]. BMJ Open, 2018, 8(6): e020873.
[16]
王俊. 老年髋部骨折患者术后睡眠障碍的影响因素及诊疗方案研究 [J].世界睡眠医学杂志, 2020, 7(7):1183-1184.
[17]
Høgestøl IK, Chahal-Kummen M, Eribe I, et al. Chronic abdominal pain and symptoms 5 years after gastric bypass for morbid obesity [J]. Obesity Surgery, 2017, 27(6): 1438-1445.
[18]
Kehlet H. Postoperative pain, analgesia, and recovery-bedfellows that cannot be ignored [J]. Pain, 2018, 159 (suppl 1): S11-S16.
[19]
鲁义, 姚嘉茵, 龚楚链, 等. 老年髋关节置换术患者术后慢性疼痛的相关因素及其预测模型 [J]. 临床麻醉学杂志, 2019, 35(12): 1197-1200.
[20]
Boerboom SL, Ann DH, Lianne VW, et al. Preperitoneal bupivacaine infiltration reduces postoperative opioid consumption, acute pain, and chronic postsurgical pain after bariatric surgery: a randomized controlled trial [J]. Obesity Surgery, 2018, 28(10): 3102-3110.
[1] 代莉, 邓恢伟, 郭华静, 黄芙蓉. 术中持续输注艾司氯胺酮对腹腔镜结直肠癌手术患者术后睡眠质量的影响[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 408-412.
[2] 杨波, 胡旭, 何金艳, 谢铭. 腹腔镜袖状胃切除术管胃固定研究现状[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 452-455.
[3] 李晓晖, 上官昌盛, 向英, 裴芝皆, 车俊志, 谢飞. 3D腹腔镜袖状胃切除术后机体能量代谢与多囊卵巢综合征患者性激素水平关系[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 538-541.
[4] 杨晓宇, 王佳, 张维峰, 陈雨辰. 两种腹横肌平面阻滞方法在老年择期腹股沟疝修补术中的应用比较[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 320-325.
[5] 马自达, 孟岩, 郭宏坤, 孙少川, 孙中伟. 腹腔镜辅助腹横肌平面阻滞在腹股沟疝修补术后镇痛中的应用[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 102-105.
[6] 谢文龙, 周建军. 超声引导下髂腹股沟-髂腹下神经阻滞联合腹横肌平面阻滞在老年腹股沟疝中的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 588-592.
[7] 周晓艳, 王志钢, 周冬喜. 超声引导下腹横肌平面阻滞在腹腔镜腹股沟疝手术中的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 579-583.
[8] 赵晓红, 修翠萍, 张瑜, 吴珂. 大康复理念在COPD稳定期肺康复治疗的临床应用[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(03): 424-426.
[9] 张婵, 吕瑶, 张小燕, 张鸣青. 不同时机局部神经阻滞在开腹肝切除中的镇痛效果比较[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(02): 189-194.
[10] 张友晶, 贾砚慧, 陈恕凤. 睡眠与心率变异性关系的研究进展[J]. 中华心脏与心律电子杂志, 2023, 11(04): 242-246.
[11] 程晨, 赵从, 蒋媛, 张丽. 术中体温水平对代谢综合征合并胃食管反流病行腹腔镜袖状胃切除联合胃底折叠术患者预后的影响[J]. 中华胃食管反流病电子杂志, 2024, 11(01): 47-52.
[12] 邢颖, 闫文貌. 单孔腹腔镜袖状胃切除术发展现状[J]. 中华肥胖与代谢病电子杂志, 2024, 10(02): 133-137.
[13] 李滢旭, 方登华, 沈宗文, 陈熊熊, 熊见武, 杨磊. 完全性内脏转位患者行腹腔镜袖状胃切除术联合胆囊切除术一例（附手术视频）[J]. 中华肥胖与代谢病电子杂志, 2023, 09(04): 299-301.
[14] 张娜, 鲁志宏, 张盛军, 陈启众, 俞永涛, 陈申思, 钱海权, 刘轲. 腹腔镜袖状胃切除术治疗肥胖合并非酒精性脂肪肝患者肝纤维化的短期疗效分析[J]. 中华肥胖与代谢病电子杂志, 2023, 09(04): 261-266.
[15] 张佳玉, 丁玉兰, 郑旋玲, 刘长勤. 睡眠障碍对多囊卵巢综合征不良影响的研究进展[J]. 中华肥胖与代谢病电子杂志, 2023, 09(02): 131-136.
阅读次数
全文


摘要

版权所有 中华医学会 中华医学电子音像出版社有限责任公司  京ICP备14006079号-1  网络出版服务许可证：(署)网出证(京)字第075号