Home    中文  
 
  • Search
  • lucene Search
  • Citation
  • Fig/Tab
  • Adv Search
Just Accepted  |  Current Issue  |  Archive  |  Featured Articles  |  Most Read  |  Most Download  |  Most Cited

Chinese Journal of Obesity and Metabolic Diseases(Electronic Edition) ›› 2025, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (04): 270-275. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-9605.2025.04.003

• Article • Previous Articles    

Analysis of clinical efficacy of single-anastomosis sleeve jejunal bypass and one-anastomosis gastric bypass in the treatment of obesity

Xing Kang1, Hang Yu1, Xiaodong Shan1,2, Xitai Sun1, Xuehui Chu1,()   

  1. 1Department of Pancreatic and Metabolic Surgery, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, 210008, Nanjing
    2Department of Surgery, Taikang Xianlin Drum Tower Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, 210046, Nanjing, China
  • Received:2025-03-15 Online:2025-11-30 Published:2026-03-10
  • Contact: Xuehui Chu

Abstract:

Objective

To compare the clinical efficacy of Single-Anastomosis Sleeve Jejunal Bypass (SASJ) and One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB) for the treatment of obesity.

Methods

Retrospective clinical data were collected from patients who underwent SASJ and OAGB from January 2023 to January 2024 at the Department of Weight Loss and Metabolic Surgery, Drum Tower Hospital, School of Medicine, Nanjing University, China, and the main indexes included the patients' preoperative and postoperative weights, BMI, and glycemic-lipid metabolism indexes from 6 to 12 months after surgery, and the remission of comorbidities was also recorded. The data were statistically analyzed using chi-square test and independent sample t-test.

Results

Total 152 patients were included in this study and were categorized into SASJ group (n=82) and OAGB group (n=70) according to the type of surgery they underwent. Significant weight loss as well as remission of complications were recorded at 6 and 12 months after both procedures. The weights at 6 and 12 months postoperatively were (93.1±15.7) kg and (84.2±16.6) kg in the SASJ group and (94.1±26.2) kg and (85.3±22.7) kg in the OAGB group, respectively.The remission rates for T2DM were 91.7% in the SASJ group and 91.7% in the OAGB group. and OAGB showed remission rates of 91.7% and 90% for T2DM and 81.3% and 80% for GERD, respectively. In addition, a relatively high risk of postoperative malnutrition in OAGB was documented at 12 months postoperatively. This was manifested by low postoperative nutritional markers such as albumin, serum calcium, and 25 hydroxyvitamin D, which were still within the normal range. Postoperative gastroscopic findings revealed anastomotic ulcers in 6 patients after OAGB, whereas SASJ had fewer abnormal postoperative gastroscopic findings, with only 1 anastomotic ulcer as well as 2 cases of reflux esophagitis.

Conclusions

SASJ and OAGB have similar efficacy in weight loss and relief of complications, while the risk of malnutrition after SASJ is lower than that after OAGB, and the probability of anastomotic ulcer after SASJ is lower.

Key words: Obesity, Bariatric surgery, Single-Anastomosis Sleeve Jejunal, One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass

京ICP 备07035254号-20
Copyright © Chinese Journal of Obesity and Metabolic Diseases(Electronic Edition), All Rights Reserved.
Tel: 020-85207287 E-mail: zhfpydxbdzzz@163.com
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd