切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肥胖与代谢病电子杂志 ›› 2023, Vol. 09 ›› Issue (04) : 261 -266. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-9605.2023.04.006

论著

腹腔镜袖状胃切除术治疗肥胖合并非酒精性脂肪肝患者肝纤维化的短期疗效分析
张娜1, 鲁志宏2, 张盛军1, 陈启众1, 俞永涛3, 陈申思3, 钱海权3, 刘轲3,()   
  1. 1. 750001 银川,宁夏医科大学总医院临床营养科
    2. 755000 中卫,宁夏中卫市人民医院医保办
    3. 750001 银川,宁夏医科大学总医院胃肠外科
  • 收稿日期:2023-10-10 出版日期:2023-11-30
  • 通信作者: 刘轲
  • 基金资助:
    宁夏自然科学基金(2021AAC03370); 宁夏科技惠民计划(2020CMG03004); 宁夏重点研发计划项目(2022BEG03076)

The short-term effects of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy for liver fibrosis in obesity-associated nonalcoholic fatty liver disease

Na Zhang1, Zhihong Lu2, Shengjun Zhang1, Qizhong Chen1, Yongtao Yu3, Shensi Chen3, Haiquan Qian3, Ke Liu3,()   

  1. 1. Department of Clinical Nutrition, General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, 750001 Yinchuan, China
    2. Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, 750001 Yinchuan, China
    3. Department of health care office, Zhongwei City People's Hospital, 755000 Zhongwei, China
  • Received:2023-10-10 Published:2023-11-30
  • Corresponding author: Ke Liu
引用本文:

张娜, 鲁志宏, 张盛军, 陈启众, 俞永涛, 陈申思, 钱海权, 刘轲. 腹腔镜袖状胃切除术治疗肥胖合并非酒精性脂肪肝患者肝纤维化的短期疗效分析[J]. 中华肥胖与代谢病电子杂志, 2023, 09(04): 261-266.

Na Zhang, Zhihong Lu, Shengjun Zhang, Qizhong Chen, Yongtao Yu, Shensi Chen, Haiquan Qian, Ke Liu. The short-term effects of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy for liver fibrosis in obesity-associated nonalcoholic fatty liver disease[J]. Chinese Journal of Obesity and Metabolic Diseases(Electronic Edition), 2023, 09(04): 261-266.

目的

分析肥胖合并非酒精性脂肪肝(NAFLD)患者通过腹腔镜袖状胃切除术(LSG)治疗肝纤维化的短期疗效。

方法

回顾性分析2021年1月至2022年12月在宁夏医科大学总医院胃肠外科行LSG的119例肥胖合并NAFLD患者的临床资料,在术后1、3、6月进行随访,比较患者手术前后人体成分分析、肝功能、血脂、血糖、肝纤维化指标的变化情况。正态分布的计量资料以(±s)表示,偏态分布以[M (QR)]表示,计数资料以绝对数表示。计量资料中术前和术后1、3、6月相关指标比较采用重复测量方差分析,其中两两比较采用LSD。

结果

术后1、3、6月人体成分分析相关指标中体质量、BMI、骨骼肌、体脂肪、体脂百分比、内脏脂肪面积、腰臀脂肪比均较术前明显下降(P<0.05),术后3、6月多余体质量减少百分比(%EWL)较术后1个月明显升高(P<0.05);术后3、6月天门冬氨酸转移酶(AST)、丙氨酸氨基转移酶(ALT)、γ-谷氨酰基转移酶(GGT)、胆碱酯酶(CHE)水平均较术前明显改善(P<0.05);术后1、3、6月甘油三酯(TG)、高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(HDL-C)、空腹血糖(FPG)、糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)水平均较术前明显改善(P<0.05);术后1、3、6月肝脏硬度值(LSM)、受控衰减参数(CAP)、NAFLD纤维化评分(NFS)均较术前明显下降(P<0.05)。

结论

LSG在短期内治疗肥胖合并NAFLD的疗效效果显著,不仅有助于减轻患者的相关体重指标,还能通过改善肝功能异常及糖脂代谢紊乱,从而缓解肝脏纤维化程度。

Objective

To investigate the short-term effects of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy for liver fibrosis in obesity-associated nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.

Methods

To retrospectively analyze the clinical data of 119 obesity patients with NALFD who underwent LSG in the General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University from January 2021 to December 2022, followed up at 1, 3 and 6 months after the operation. The changes in human component analysis, liver function, lipid metabolism, blood glucose, and hepatic fibrosis were compared. The measurement data of normal distribution is expressed by (±s), the skew distribution is expressed by [M (QR)] and the counting data is expressed by absolute number. In the measurement data, repeated measurement ANOVA was used to compare the relevant indicators before surgery and 1, 3 and 6 months after surgery, and LSD was used for pairwise comparison.

Results

The body weight, body mass index, body fat mass, skeletal muscle mass, body fat ratio, waist-hip fat ratio, and visceral fat area of the patients at postoperative 1, 3, and 6 months decreased significantly compared with that before operation (P<0.05). The percentage of excess weight loss (%EWL) of the patients at postoperative 3 and 6 months improved significantly compared to postoperative 1 month (P<0.05). The aspartate transferase, aminotransferase, γ-glutamyltransferase, and cholinesterase of the patients at postoperative 3 and 6 months improved significantly compared with that before operation (P<0.05). The triglyceride, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, fasting plasma glucose, and glycosylated hemoglobin of the patients at postoperative 1, 3, and 6 months improved significantly compared with that before operation (P<0.05). The liver stiffness measurement, controlled attenuation parameter and NALFD fiber score of the patients at postoperative 1, 3 and 6 months decreased significantly compared with that before operation (P<0.05).

Conclusions

LSG has an accurate short-term clinical efficacy for obesity-associated NAFLD, which not only reduce body mass, but also relieves the degree of liver fibrosis by improving liver function and the disorders of glucose and lipid metabolism.

表1 肥胖合并NAFLD患者LSG术前和术后人体成分分析相关指标变化情况(±s
表2 肥胖合并NAFLD患者LSG术前和术后血液学指标变化情况(±s
表3 肥胖合并NAFLD患者LSG术前和术后肝纤维化指标变化情况(±s
[1]
Wang L, Zhou B, Zhao Z, et al. Body-mass index and obesity in urban and rural China: findings from consecutive nationally representative surveys during 2004-2018 [J]. Lancet, 2021, 398(10294): 53-63.
[2]
Vernon G, Baranova A, Younossi ZM. Systematic review: the epidemiology and natural history of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis in adults [J]. Aliment Pharmacol Ther, 2011, 34(3): 274-285.
[3]
Machado M, Marques-vidal P, Cortez-pinto H. Hepatic histology in obese patients undergoing bariatric surgery [J]. J Hepatol, 2006, 45(4): 600-606.
[4]
中华医学会肝病学分会脂肪肝和酒精性肝病学组, 中国医师协会脂肪性肝病专家委员会, 范建高, 等. 非酒精性脂肪性肝病防治指南(2018年更新版) [J]. 实用肝脏病杂志, 2018, 21(02): 30-39.
[5]
陈建能, 陈爱萍, 潘勤, 等. FibroScan~实施受控衰减参数检测肝脂肪变的影响因素及应用价值分析 [J]. 肝脏, 2016, 21(10): 805-809.
[6]
Pu Ke, Wang Yuping, Bai Suyang, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) as a non-invasive test for steatosis in suspected non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. BMC Gastroenterol, 2019, 19(1): 51.
[7]
Andrade P, Rodrigues S, Rodrigues-pinto E, et al. Diagnostic Accuracy of Controlled Attenuation Parameter for Detecting Hepatic Steatosis in Patients with Chronic Liver Disease [J]. GE Port J Gastroenterol, 2017, 24(4): 161-168.
[8]
Segura-azuara N, Varela-chinchilla CD, Trinidad-calderon PA. MAFLD/NAFLD Biopsy-Free Scoring Systems for Hepatic Steatosis, NASH, and Fibrosis Diagnosis [J]. Front Med (Lausanne), 2021, 8: 774079.
[9]
von Schonfels W, Beckmann JH, Ahrens M, et al. Histologic improvement of NAFLD in patients with obesity after bariatric surgery based on standardized NAS (NAFLD activity score) [J]. Surg Obes Relat Dis, 2018, 14(10): 1607-1616.
[10]
高风娇, 刘海勇. 腹腔镜袖状胃切除术(LSG)治疗肥胖合并非酒精性脂肪肝病的效果分析 [J]. 世界最新医学信息文摘(连续型电子期刊), 2020, 20(43): 2.
[11]
中华医学会外科学分会甲状腺及代谢外科学组, 中国医师协会外科医师分会肥胖和糖尿病外科医师委员会. 中国肥胖及2型糖尿病外科治疗指南(2019版) [J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2019, 39(4): 301-306.
[12]
非酒精性脂肪性肝病防治指南(2018年更新版)[J]. 实用肝脏病杂志, 2018, 21(02): 177-186.
[13]
冷雪君, 颜学兵. FibroTouch~对不同BMI水平非酒精性脂肪性肝病患者肝纤维化程度的评估比较 [J]. 临床肝胆病杂志, 2018, 34(09): 1891-1895.
[14]
魏建东, 苟小军, 陈远卓, 等. 非酒精性脂肪性肝病合并2型糖尿病患者脂肪受控衰减参数及肝脏硬度值的变化 [J]. 肝脏, 2022, 27(03): 355-357.
[15]
Maier S, Wieland A, Cree-green M, et al. Lean NAFLD: an underrecognized and challenging disorder in medicine [J]. Rev Endocr Metab Disord, 2021, 22(2): 351-366.
[16]
方伟进, 樊志强, 龚慧, 等. 酸性鞘磷脂酶对非酒精性脂肪肝病的作用及PPARα-PGC-1α通路的影响 [J]. 中国药理学通报, 2023, 39(01): 57-65.
[17]
Ramadan MS, Russo V, Nigro G, et al. Interplay between Heart Disease and Metabolic Steatosis: A Contemporary Perspective [J]. J Clin Med, 2021, 10(8): 6.
[18]
Cobbina E, Akhlaghi F. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) - pathogenesis, classification, and effect on drug metabolizing enzymes and transporters [J]. Drug Metab Rev, 2017, 49(2): 197-211.
[19]
Ahima RS. The natural history of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: insights from children and mice [J]. Gastroenterology, 2008, 135(6): 1860-1862.
[20]
肖志立, 郑文彬, 杨钧, 等. 腹腔镜袖状胃切除术治疗肥胖症相关非酒精性脂肪性肝病的临床疗效 [J]. 中华消化外科杂志, 2021, 20(9): 6.
[21]
徐淼, 王辉, 钱行君, 等. 女性肥胖型非酒精性脂肪性肝病患者肝脏炎症指标水平及关联性分析 [J]. 现代实用医学, 2021, 33(07): 862-864.
[22]
Vilar-gomez E, Martinez-perez Y, Calzadilla-bertot L, et al. Weight Loss Through Lifestyle Modification Significantly Reduces Features of Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis [J]. Gastroenterology, 2015, 149(2): 367-378, quiz e14- quiz e15.
[23]
Mccarty T R, Echouffo-tcheugui J B, Lange A, et al. Impact of bariatric surgery on outcomes of patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a nationwide inpatient sample analysis, 2004-2012[J]. Surg Obes Relat Dis, 2018, 14(1): 74-80.
[24]
崔贝贝, 朱利勇, 李鹏洲, 等. 减重代谢手术对身体成分构成的影响[J]. 中华消化外科杂志, 2020, 19(11): 10.
[25]
Clark JM, Brancati FL, Diehl AM. The prevalence and etiology of elevated aminotransferase levels in the United States [J]. Am J Gastroenterol, 2003, 98(5): 960-967.
[26]
Bi WR, Yang CQ, Shi Q, et al. Large-scale analysis of factors influencing nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and its relationship with liver enzymes [J]. Genet Mol Res, 2014, 13(3): 5880-5891.
[27]
何岩. 腹腔镜下袖状胃切除术治疗肥胖伴非酒精性脂肪肝病的疗效分析及其相关影响因素分析 [D]. 2021.
[28]
于新颖, 闫文貌, 王麟, 等. 腹腔镜袖状胃切除术治疗肥胖合并非酒精性脂肪肝的疗效 [J]. 中华普通外科杂志, 2021, 36(11).
[29]
郭洪礼, 梁红亮, 张涛, 等. 肝硬化患者左心室收缩功能与心功能分级肝脏硬度的关系分析 [J]. 河北医学, 2023, 29(02): 285-289.
[1] 陈镁仪, 李伊尧, 张梦圆, 许杰, 马若凡, 李登, 顾菁. 图示化自主髋关节功能评分系统的应用研究[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 320-328.
[2] 聂生军, 王钰, 王毅, 鲜小庆, 马生成. 复方倍他米松局部注射联合光动力疗法治疗小型瘢痕疙瘩的临床疗效观察[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(05): 404-410.
[3] 陈嘉婷, 杜美君, 石冰, 黄汉尧. 母体系统性疾病对新生儿唇腭裂发生的影响[J]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 262-268.
[4] 吉顺富, 汤晓燕, 徐进. 腹腔镜近端胃癌根治术中拓展胃后间隙在肥胖患者中的应用研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 393-396.
[5] 谢丽春, 欧庆芬, 张秋萍, 叶升. 简化和标准肝脏MRI方案在结直肠癌肝转移患者随访中的临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 434-437.
[6] 杨波, 胡旭, 何金艳, 谢铭. 腹腔镜袖状胃切除术管胃固定研究现状[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 452-455.
[7] 莫淇舟, 苏劲, 黄健, 李健维, 李思宁, 柳建军. 智能控压输尿管软镜碎石吸引取石术在直径10~25 mm上尿路结石中的应用[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 497-502.
[8] 刘明昊, 李晨, 王冰, 万政, 田文. 机器人与腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术对比研究[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 376-382.
[9] 杨万荣, 任治坤, 时新颍. 沙丁胺醇雾化吸入脾多肽治疗AECOPD的疗效分析[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(04): 609-612.
[10] 梁艳娉, 列诗韵, 王艺穗, 吴晓瑛, 林颖. 基于内镜操作细节记录系统构建胃底静脉曲张内镜下组织胶注射术的标准化管理方案[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 705-709.
[11] 危用洋, 黄俊甫, 辛万鹏, 易思清, 涂书举, 方康, 李勇, 肖卫东. 三种术式治疗胰腺颈体部良性或低度恶性肿瘤的临床疗效分析[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(04): 515-519.
[12] 黄福秀, 张宁宁, 李晨阳, 李淑玲, 陈超. 单纯电切、单纯电凝与电凝电切术对扁平肠息肉疗效及不良事件发生率的影响[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(04): 310-314.
[13] 陶金华, 陈珊珊, 陈晓四. 阿帕替尼联合替吉奥治疗晚期食管癌的疗效与安全性影响因素评价[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(04): 325-329.
[14] 周敏, 张仁清, 卢贤红. 秋泻灵联合双歧杆菌三联活菌散对轮状病毒腹泻患儿免疫功能、心肌酶和C反应蛋白的影响[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(04): 365-368.
[15] 袁捷, 乔钰琪, 李彦冬. 二甲双胍、来曲唑联合地屈孕酮治疗多囊卵巢综合征合并不孕症的效果评价[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 343-347.
阅读次数
全文


摘要