切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肥胖与代谢病电子杂志 ›› 2020, Vol. 06 ›› Issue (03) : 180 -184. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-9605.2020.03.008

所属专题: 专题评论 文献

论著

腹横肌平面阻滞在肥胖产妇行剖宫产手术的镇痛效果评价
刘春华1,(), 黎达锋1   
  1. 1. 529500 阳江,广东省阳江市人民医院·广东医科大学附属阳江市人民医院麻醉科
  • 收稿日期:2020-08-08 出版日期:2020-08-30
  • 通信作者: 刘春华

Evaluation of the analgesic effect of transversus abdominis plane block in obese women undergoing cesarean section

Chunhua Liu1,(), Dafeng Li1   

  1. 1. Department of Anesthesiology, Yangjiang People's Hospital, Affiliated to Guangdong Medical University, Yangjiang 529500, China
  • Received:2020-08-08 Published:2020-08-30
  • Corresponding author: Chunhua Liu
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Liu Chunhua, Email:
引用本文:

刘春华, 黎达锋. 腹横肌平面阻滞在肥胖产妇行剖宫产手术的镇痛效果评价[J/OL]. 中华肥胖与代谢病电子杂志, 2020, 06(03): 180-184.

Chunhua Liu, Dafeng Li. Evaluation of the analgesic effect of transversus abdominis plane block in obese women undergoing cesarean section[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Obesity and Metabolic Diseases(Electronic Edition), 2020, 06(03): 180-184.

目的

评价腹横肌平面(TAP)阻滞在肥胖产妇行剖宫产手术的镇痛效果。

方法

选取2019年1月至2020年6月于阳江市人民医院行剖宫产手术的肥胖产妇共50例,随机分为处理组和对照组,每组25例,处理组术前应用超声引导下腹横肌平面阻滞,每侧注射0.375%的罗哌卡因20 ml,对照组常规治疗;对比两组产妇术后24 h、48 h通过自控静脉镇痛给予的舒芬太尼剂量,记录初次追加镇痛的时间,对比两组术后不同时间点的疼痛评分、Ramsay镇静和BCS舒适度评分,记录两组的不良反应。

结果

处理组自控静脉镇痛中24 h、48 h的舒芬太尼用量显著少于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.01);处理组术后首次追加镇痛时间显著大于对照(P<0.01),且处理组术后4 h、8 h、12 h、24 h和48 h其静息及活动时的疼痛VAS评分均显著低于对照组(P<0.05),处理组术后12 h和24 h的BCS舒适度评分显著高于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.001)。两组术后的Ramsay镇静和PONV评分对比差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

TAP阻滞在肥胖产妇行剖宫产术具有良好的镇痛效果,能显著提高产妇的术后舒适度,安全性良好。

Objective

To evaluate the analgesic effect of transverse abdominal plane (TAP) block in obese women undergoing cesarean section.

Methods

A total of 50 obese women who underwent cesarean section at Yangjiang People’s Hospital from January 2019 to June 2020 were selected and randomly divided into treatment group and control group, 25 cases in each group. The treatment group was treated with ultrasound-guided lower transversus abdominis plane block before operation, and 0.375% ropivacaine 20 ml was injected on each side. The control group was given conventional treatment. Comparing the doses of sufentanil given by patient-controlled epidural analgesia at 24 h and 48 h after operation between the two groups of parturients, recording the time of initial supplementary analgesia, and comparing the pain scores, Ramsay sedation and BCS comfort of the two groups at different time points after surgery Score, record the adverse reactions of the two groups.

Results

The amount of sufentanil in 24 h and 48 h in patient-controlled epidural analgesia in the treatment group was significantly less than that in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.01); The first additional analgesia time in the treatment group was significantly longer than that in the control group (P<0.01), and 4 h, 8 h, 12 h, 24 h and 48h postoperative pain VAS scores of the treatment group were significantly lower than those of the control group (P<0.05). The BCS comfort scores of the treatment group at 12 h and 24 h after surgery were significantly higher than those of the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in Ramsay sedation and PONV scores between the two groups (P>0.05).

Conclusions

TAP block has a good analgesic effect in obese women undergoing cesarean section, can significantly improve the postoperative comfort of the women, and has good safety.

表1 两组产妇的一般资料比较
表2 两组产妇的舒芬太尼用量和首次追加镇痛对比
表3 两组产妇静息时的VAS评分比较
表4 两组产妇活动时的VAS评分比较
表5 两组产妇的Ramsay镇静和BCS舒适度评分对比
[1]
包菊,邓春梅,曲元.不同硬膜外镇痛模式对肥胖产妇镇痛效果和分娩方式的影响[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2019,35(10):948-951.
[2]
孙家铎,贺梦娇,张庆国.腹横肌平面阻滞在剖宫产术后镇痛的应用进展[J].广东医学,2018,39(S1):309-312.
[3]
Kakade A, Wagh G. Evaluate the Feasibility of Surgical Transversus Abdominis Plane Block for Postoperative Analgesia After Cesarean Section[J]. J Obstet Gynaecol India, 2019, 69(4): 330-333.
[4]
杨明敏,张奇芬,罗和国,等.超声引导下双侧腹横肌平面阻滞对二次剖宫产产妇术后镇痛和早期泌乳的影响[J].广东医学,2019,40(22):3136-3140.
[5]
魏风云,梁晋,殷波,等.剖宫产术后腹横肌平面阻滞与切口浸润镇痛效果及安全性的Meta分析[J].兰州大学学报(医学版),2019,45(02):1-9.
[6]
Saber AA, Lee YC, Chandrasekaran A, et al. Efficacy of transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block in pain management after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG): A double-blind randomized controlled trial[J]. Am J Surg, 2019, 217(1): 126-132.
[7]
Tonidandel A, Booth J, D’Angelo E,et al. Anesthetic and obstetric outcomes in morbidly obese parturients: a 20-year follow-up retrospective cohort study[J]. Int J Obstet Anesth, 2014, 23 (4): 357-364.

URL    
[8]
刘晓宁,许茜,孙越,等.超声引导下腹横肌平面阻滞在全麻剖宫产术后镇痛应用[J].中国计划生育学杂志,2019,27(11):1452-1455.
[9]
Verma K, Malawat A, Jethava D, et al. Comparison of transversus abdominis plane block and quadratus lumborum block for post-caesarean section analgesia: A randomised clinical trial[J]. Indian J Anaesth, 2019, 63(10): 820-826.
[10]
Boules ML, Goda AS. Comparison of Analgesic Effect Between Erector Spinae Plane Block and Transversus Abdominis Plane Block After Elective Cesarean Section: A Prospective Randomized Single-Blind Controlled Study[J]. 2020, 13: 1073-1080.
[11]
Albrecht E, Kirkham KR, Endersby RV, et al. Ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block for laparoscopic gastric-bypass surgery: a prospective randomized controlled double-blinded trial[J]. Obes Surg, 2013, 23(8): 1309-1314.

URL    
[12]
Zhou H, Ma XF, Pan JH, et al. Effects of transversus abdominis plane blocks after hysterectomy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials[J]. Journal of Pain Research, 2018, 11: 2477-2489.
[13]
Cole J, Hughey S, Longwell J. Transversus abdominis plane block and intrathecal morphine use in cesarean section: a retrospective review[J]. Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, 2019, 44(11): rapm-2019-100483.
[14]
Junge J, Inchiosa MA, Xu JL. Exploring the transversus abdominis plane block in cesarean sections and the subsequent toxicity risk to neonates via breast milk[J]. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol, 2019, 35(2): 153-156.
[1] 李霞林, 贺芳. 产后出血风险评估和早期预警系统[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(05): 498-503.
[2] 刘子洋, 崔俭俭, 赵茵. 产科弥散性血管内凝血及其评分系统的研究现状[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(05): 511-518.
[3] 曾凡英, 阮洁, 刘兴会, 何国琳. 新生育形势下的围产医学研究现状及孕期保健中的应对策略[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(05): 519-524.
[4] 李小飞, 刘洪莉, 石丘玲, 田静, 李莉, 漆洪波, 罗欣. 自然分娩产妇低强度聚焦超声子宫复旧治疗防治产后出血的前瞻性随机对照研究[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(05): 534-539.
[5] 向韵, 卢游, 杨凡. 全氟及多氟烷基化合物暴露与儿童肥胖症相关性研究现状[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(05): 569-574.
[6] 赵丽霞, 王春霞, 陈一锋, 胡东平, 张维胜, 王涛, 张洪来. 内脏型肥胖对腹腔镜直肠癌根治术后早期并发症的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 35-39.
[7] 孟令凯, 李大勇, 王宁, 王桂明, 张炳南, 李若彤, 潘立峰. 袖状胃切除术对肥胖伴2型糖尿病大鼠的作用及机制研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 638-642.
[8] 李猛, 姜腊, 董磊, 吴情, 贾犇黎. 腹腔镜胃袖状切除术治疗肥胖合并2型糖尿病及脂肪胰的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 554-557.
[9] 杨波, 胡旭, 何金艳, 谢铭. 腹腔镜袖状胃切除术管胃固定研究现状[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 452-455.
[10] 方辉强, 黄杰, 随冰琰. 腰方肌阻滞与腹横肌平面阻滞对腹股沟疝腹腔镜手术患者术后镇痛效果的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 697-702.
[11] 玉素江·图荪托合提, 韩琦, 麦麦提艾力·麦麦提明, 黄旭东, 王浩, 克力木·阿不都热依木, 艾克拜尔·艾力. 腹腔镜袖状胃切除或联合食管裂孔疝修补术对肥胖症合并胃食管反流病的中期疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 501-506.
[12] 刘见, 杨晓波, 何均健, 等. 应用电钩三孔法腹腔镜袖状胃切除术[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(06): 363-364.
[13] 胡启明, 鄢潇, 尤志学, 黄骁昊. 经瘢痕处单孔腹腔镜下切除多病灶腹壁子宫内膜异位症[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 314-317.
[14] 谢浩文, 丁建英, 刘小霞, 冯毅, 姚婧. 椎旁神经阻滞对微创胃切除肥胖患者术中血流、术后应激及康复质量的影响[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 569-573.
[15] 王星, 陈园, 热孜万古丽·乌斯曼, 郭艳英. T2DM、Obesity、NASH、PCOS共同致病因素相关的分子机制[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 481-490.
阅读次数
全文


摘要