切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肥胖与代谢病电子杂志 ›› 2017, Vol. 03 ›› Issue (04) : 220 -225. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-9605.2017.04.008

所属专题: 文献

临床研究

加速康复外科理念在腹腔镜袖状胃切除术围手术期管理的应用研究
张强1, 侯栋升1, 姚立彬1, 李超1, 王辉1, 孟松1, 洪健1, 邵永1, 朱孝成1,()   
  1. 1. 221000 徐州,徐州医科大学附属医院胃肠外科
  • 收稿日期:2017-11-08 出版日期:2017-11-30
  • 通信作者: 朱孝成

Application of enhanced recovery after surgery in bariatric surgery

Qiang Zhang1, Dongsheng Hou1, Libin Yao1, Chao Li1, Hui Wang1, Song Meng1, Jian Hong1, Yong Shao1, Xiaocheng Zhu1,()   

  1. 1. Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou 221000, China
  • Received:2017-11-08 Published:2017-11-30
  • Corresponding author: Xiaocheng Zhu
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Zhu Xiaocheng, Email:
引用本文:

张强, 侯栋升, 姚立彬, 李超, 王辉, 孟松, 洪健, 邵永, 朱孝成. 加速康复外科理念在腹腔镜袖状胃切除术围手术期管理的应用研究[J/OL]. 中华肥胖与代谢病电子杂志, 2017, 03(04): 220-225.

Qiang Zhang, Dongsheng Hou, Libin Yao, Chao Li, Hui Wang, Song Meng, Jian Hong, Yong Shao, Xiaocheng Zhu. Application of enhanced recovery after surgery in bariatric surgery[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Obesity and Metabolic Diseases(Electronic Edition), 2017, 03(04): 220-225.

目的

探讨加速康复外科(ERAS)应用于腹腔镜袖状胃切除术(LSG)围手术期管理的有效性和安全性。

方法

前瞻性分析2016年9月至2017年10月在徐州医科大学附属医院胃肠外科接受LSG的80例患者的临床资料,按照是否行ERAS模式分为ERAS组(研究组,40例)、非ERAS组(对照组,40例)。研究组采用ERAS流程管理,包括饮食、生理状态调整及心理状态评估,术前禁食6 h,非糖尿病患者术前2 h饮用250 ml糖水,糖尿病患者饮用250 ml生理盐水,全身麻醉后置入胃管及导尿管,术中电热毯或吹风机辅助保温。麻醉清醒后即进水,倡导早期进食,不使用镇痛泵,仅按需予以氟比洛芬酯镇痛。对照组采用传统模式管理,术前禁食12 h,禁水4 h,术前一晚口服泻药行肠道准备,术前置入胃管及导尿管,术后等待排气后开始进食,留置镇痛泵镇痛。记录两组患者手术信息、术后恢复情况、疼痛评分、应激指标和营养状态指标,两组间的差异采用t检验和Mann-Whitney检验进行分析。分类数据使用Fisher精确检验和Pearson卡方检验进行分析。

结果

研究组较对照组缩短了术后住院时间[(3.3±1.2) d vs (5.0±2.4) d,P<0.05]、胃管留置时间[(0.05±0.2) d vs (1.18±0.59) d,P<0.05],加快术后进食时间[(1.73±0.56) d vs (2.55±0.68) d,P<0.05]、排气时间[(1.88±0.69) d vs (2.50±0.72) d,P<0.05],疼痛程度较对照组减轻(P<0.05),且术后白细胞及中性粒细胞计数水平均低于对照组(P<0.05),而术后白蛋白、前白蛋白水平均高于对照组(P<0.05)。

结论

ERAS应用于LSG围手术期可显著缩短住院时间并加快术后营养恢复,值得在实践中推广应用。

Objective

To investigate the effectiveness and safety of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in the management of undergoing LSG patients during perioperative management.

Methods

Prospective study the clinical data of 80 patients undergoing LSG surgery in the Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery of the Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University from September 2016 to October 2017. The patients were divided into ERAS group (experimental group, 40 cases), non-ERAS group (control group, 40 cases). The experimental group were managed using ERAS protocol, including psychological status assessment, preoperative fasting 6h, non-diabetic patients were given 250 ml of sugar water 2h before surgery, while diabetic patients received 250 ml saline, after induction of anesthesia NG tube and urine catheter were placed, intraoperative electric heater blanket or heater blower to help maintaining warm condition. Immediately after anesthesia recovery, water intake was allowed, promote early eating, analgesic pump were not used if not on-demand, only used flurbiprofenaxetil analgesia. On the other hand, the control group used the traditional model of management, which is preoperative fasting 12 h, water intake allowed up to 4 h before surgery, one night before surgery, oral laxative for bowel preparation, preoperative gastric tube and catheterization, food intake were only allowed after flatus, often used analgesia pump. The operation information, postoperative recovery, pain score, stress index and nutritional status were recorded. The differences between the two groups were analyzed by t-test and Mann-Whitney test. Classification data were analyzed by Fisher's exact test and Pearson's chi-square test.

Results

Compared with the control group, the experimental group had shorter length of postoperative hospital stay (3.3±1.2d vs 5.0±2.4d, P<0.05) ,gastric tube indwelling time (0.05±0.2d vs 1.18±0.59d, P<0.05), accelerate postoperative first time food intake (1.73±0.56d vs2.55±0.68d, P<0.05 ), and flatus time (1.88±0.69d vs2.50±0.72d, P<0.05). The degree of postoperative pain lower than the control group (P<0.05), the postoperative white blood cells and neutrophil count levels were lower than those in the control group (P<0.05). On the other hand, postoperative albumin, prealbumin were higher in the experimental group than the control group (P<0.05).

Conclusions

The management of LSG surgery patients using ERAS protocol can shorten the length of hospital stay and accelerate the recovery of postoperative nutritional status. It is safe and reliable and worth popularizing in practice.

表1 研究组与对照组患者基线资料和代谢障碍的比较
表2 研究组与对照组患者手术信息及术后恢复状况的比较(±s
表3 研究组与对照组患者术后并发症发生情况比较(n)
表4 研究组与对照组患者术后镇痛效果及应激指标比较(±s
表5 研究组与对照组患者营养状态比较(±s
[1]
KehletH. Multimodal approach to control postoperative pathophysiology and rehabilitation[J]. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 1997, 78:606-617.
[2]
Anderson AD, Mcnaught CE, MacFie J, et al. Randomized clinicaltrialof multimodal optimization and standard perioperative surgicalcare[J].British Journal of Surgery, 2003, 90:1497-1504.
[3]
Ryo Tanaka, Sang-Woong Lee, Masaru Kawai, et al. Protocol for enhanced recovery after surgery improves short-term outcomes for patients with gastric cancer: a randomized clinical trial[J]. Gastric Cancer, 2017, 20(5):861-871.
[4]
Serclova Z, Dytrych P, Marvan J, et al. Fast-track in open intestinal surgery: prospective randomized study (Clinical Trials Gov Identifier no. NCT00123456)[J]. Clinical Nutrition, 2009, 28:618-624.
[5]
Muller S, Zalunardo MP, Hubner M, et al. A fast-trackprogram reduces complications and length of hospital stay afteropen colonic surgery[J]. Gastroenterology, 2009, 136:842-847.
[6]
Thorell A, MacCormick AD, Awad S, et al. Guidelines for Perioperative Care in Bariatric Surgery: EnhancedRecovery After Surgery (ERAS) Society Recommendations[J]. World Journal of Surgery, 2009, 136:842-847.
[7]
李滢旭,方登华,杨浩雷, 等. 加速康复外科在腹腔镜减肥手术中的初步应用体会[J/CD]. 中华肥胖与代谢病电子杂志, 2016, 2(1): 30-34.
[8]
Manuela M. Erratum to: Abstracts from the 22nd World Congress of the International Federation for the Surgery of Obesity & Metabolic Disorders (IFSO), London, 29 August – 2 September 2017.Obesity Surgery[J].Obesity Surgery,2017,27:2779-2779.
[9]
中国医师协会外科医师分会肥胖和糖尿病外科医师委员会.中国肥胖和2型糖尿病外科治疗指南(2014)[J].中国实用外科学杂志,2014, 34(11):1005-1010.
[10]
Caprini JA.Thrombosis risk assessment as a guide to quality patient care[J].Dise Mon,2005,5l(2/3):70-78.
[11]
Bischoff JM, EnghuusMC, Werner U, et al. Long-term follow-up after mesh removal and selective neurectomy for persistent inguinal postherniorrhaphypain[J].Hernia,2013,17(3):339-345.
[12]
Varadhan KK, Neal KR, DejongCH, et al. The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway for patients undergoing major elective open colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials [J].Clinical Nutrition,2010,29(4):434-440.
[13]
骆鹏飞,荚卫东,许戈良,等.加速康复外科理念在原发性肝癌患者肝切除围手术期中的应用[J].中华普通外科杂志,2015,30(11):862-865.
[14]
汤建燕,邬叶锋,程邦君,等.加速康复外科在胃肠外科围手术期应用进展[J]. 中国普通外科杂志,2013,22(4):498-501.
[15]
Perinel J, Adham IM.ERAS and pancreatic surgery: a review[J].Updates in Surgery,2016,68(3):253-255.
[16]
Ljungqvist O, Nygren J, Thorell A. Insulin resistance and eIectivesurgery[J].surgery,200l,128(5):757-760.
[17]
Huerta S, Arteaga JR, Sawicki MP, et al. Assessment ofroutine elimination of postoperative nasogastric decompressionafter Roux-en-Y gastric bypass[J]. Surgery 2002,132(5):844-848.
[18]
Marie CB, Gignoux B, Yann M,et al.Experience with an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Program for Bariatric Surgery: Comparison of MGB and LSG in 374 Patients[J].Obesity Surgery,2017,27(7):1896-1900.
[19]
尚游.氟比洛芬酯联合吗啡用于直肠癌患者术后镇痛效果观察[J].山东医,2014,54(2):37-38.
[20]
覃鲁,张维恭,钟海生.氟比洛芬酯联合吗啡镇痛对胃癌根治术患者术后吗啡用药量及肠功能恢复的影响[J].西部医学,2017,27(8):1258-1260.
[21]
Lewis SJ, Egger M, Sylvester PA, et al.Early enteral feeding versus'nil by mouthafter gastrointestinal surgery:systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled trials[J].British Medical Journal, 2001,323(7316):773-776.
[22]
Henriksen MG, Jensen MB, Hansen HV, et al. Enforced mobilizationearly oral feeding and balanced analgesia improve convalescence after colorectal surgely[J].Nutrition, 2002,18(2):147-152.
[23]
Thorell A, MacCormick AD, Awad S, et al. Guidelines for perioperative care in bariatric surgery: enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) society recommendations. World Journal of Surgery,2016,40(9):2065-2083.
[24]
杨华,张俊昌,杨景哥, 等. 加速康复外科理念在肥胖与代谢病外科的应用[J/CD]. 中华肥胖与代谢病电子杂志, 2016, 2(1): 39-42.
[1] 马桥桥, 张传开, 郭开今, 蒋涛, 王子豪, 刘勇, 郝亮. 可降解止血粉减少初次全膝关节置换术失血量的研究[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 585-589.
[2] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[3] 刘世君, 马杰, 师鲁静. 胃癌完整系膜切除术+标准D2根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 27-30.
[4] 李华志, 曹广, 刘殿刚, 张雅静. 不同入路下行肝切除术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的临床对比[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 52-55.
[5] 常小伟, 蔡瑜, 赵志勇, 张伟. 高强度聚焦超声消融术联合肝动脉化疗栓塞术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的效果及安全性分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 56-59.
[6] 王露, 周丽君. 全腹腔镜下远端胃大部切除不同吻合方式对胃癌患者胃功能恢复、并发症发生率的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 92-95.
[7] 许杰, 李亚俊, 冯义文. SOX新辅助化疗后腹腔镜胃癌D2根治术与常规根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 647-650.
[8] 康婵娟, 张海涛, 翟静洁. 胰管支架置入术治疗急性胆源性胰腺炎的效果及对患者肝功能、炎症因子水平的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 667-670.
[9] 付成旺, 杨大刚, 王榕, 李福堂. 营养与炎症指标在可切除胰腺癌中的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 704-708.
[10] 曾繁利, 齐秩凯, 杨贺庆. 两种经Glisson蒂鞘解剖路径肝切除术治疗原发性肝癌的肿瘤学疗效及风险比对[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 525-527.
[11] 王维花, 王楠, 乔庆, 罗红. 完全腹腔镜右半结肠癌切除术两种腔内消化道重建方案对比研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 574-577.
[12] 刘见, 杨晓波, 何均健, 等. 应用电钩三孔法腹腔镜袖状胃切除术[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(06): 363-364.
[13] 李澄清, 郭文毅, 王磊. 腹腔镜保留脾脏胰体尾切除术:微创胰腺外科的合理决策[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 620-624.
[14] 罗柳平, 吴萌萌, 陈欣磊, 林科灿. 胰腺全系膜切除在胰头癌根治术中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 651-656.
[15] 韩青雷, 丛赟, 李佳隆, 邵英梅. 术前减黄方式对壶腹周围癌胰十二指肠切除术后并发症的影响[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 665-669.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?